Hi,
Am 24.06.20 um 00:31 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> in Italy or Germany, the boundaries of protected areas typically either
> exclude builtup areas or if they are included, there are typically explicit
> special explanations/provisions for these areas. (there might be exceptions
> to this,
Jun 24, 2020, 00:31 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 23. Jun 2020, at 17:20, Joseph Eisenberg
>> wrote:
>>
>> In other countries, how are National Park and other protected_area
>> boundaries determined? If there are villages or towns within the boundary,
>> are
Here in Australia they started off as rough areas based on local knowledge
and signage on the ground but now have mostly been replaced with imported
open data from the government.These legally declared boundaries are usually
declared based on parcels from the cadastre and so the open data usually
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 4:48 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> when I write „protected area“, this often will have implications like you
may not construct buildings, you may not walk off roads and paths, you may
not pick plants (e.g. flowers) and mushrooms, log trees, hunt, light a
fire, etc.,
On 6/23/20 4:45 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> Interesting. I had always assumed that the land that a mining claim
> covered continued to be owned by the Federal Government, but that the
> claim holder had the right to extract minerals and hopefully an
> obligation to pay the Federal Government some
when I write „protected area“, this often will have implications like you may
not construct buildings, you may not walk off roads and paths, you may not pick
plants (e.g. flowers) and mushrooms, log trees, hunt, light a fire, etc., while
otherwise in Germany you have generally the right to walk
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:40 AM Rob Savoye wrote:
>
>
> The rural area I live in is full of old mining claims, which are
> private property surrounded by public land.
Interesting. I had always assumed that the land that a mining claim
covered continued to be owned by the Federal Government,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:21 AM Adam Franco wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:40 AM Rob Savoye wrote:
>>
>> [...] While I do use parcel maps on fire calls, adding all these
boundaries to OSM would be silly. I agree that mapping the outer boundary
is all that's needed.
>
>
> My main use of
sent from a phone
> On 23. Jun 2020, at 17:20, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> In other countries, how are National Park and other protected_area boundaries
> determined? If there are villages or towns within the boundary, are they
> actually protected? Are they excluded from the area?
in
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:40 AM Rob Savoye wrote:
>
[...] While I do use parcel maps on fire calls, adding all these boundaries
> to OSM would be silly. I agree that mapping the outer boundary is all
> that's needed.
>
My main use of maps of National Forests is planning backcountry trips
On 6/23/20 9:18 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The argument in favor of the second is that the privately-owned land
> within the boundary has no actual protection against development. For
> example, I lived in a village which was within the declared boundaries
> of the Klamath National Forest, but
Here's the official USFS map online: the dark green line is the declared
outer boundary of the National Forest. When you zoom in, 2 different colors
are shown: the slightly darker green areas are the land owned by the
Federal Government, while lighter areas are privately owned. This is easier
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
