Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > in the case of a prison farm I would think it is part of the prison. This > is not about ownership. By the way, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-prison-horses-idUSKBN0ET1RA20140618 is one of the prisons

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Dave Swarthout
>To me, prisons are not so different than schools or hospitals, in that >there is a land area for the facility and then buildings within. So >your approach sounds right. +1 Cheers, Dave On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > When it comes to farmland, I would not consider it part of the amenity. > It might > > be operated by the facility, fine. But as we do not tag ownership, the > fact that > > is owned by the institution would

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Greg Troxel
Kevin Kenny writes: > If I have the cadastral information for the lands (which are usually posted > to forbid entry, so visible "in the field"), what's a recommended way to > tag? What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then > barrier=wall

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 23:29, Tom Pfeifer > ha scritto: > > When it is a bit of green space around, visitor/staff parking etc, I'd agree. > > When it comes to farmland, I would not consider it part of the amenity. It > might > be

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 23:38, Tod Fitch ha > scritto: > > I am stunned to find that prisons are categorized as amenities so the rest of > this thread about tagging details of such seems straight out of a Monte > Python skit. yes, it's a

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Tod Fitch
> On Aug 9, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/08/09 22:20: >>> Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny >>> ha scritto: >>> >>> What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/08/09 22:20: Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny ha scritto: What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then barrier=wall or barrier=fence on the enclosure. sounds reasonable to me When it

Re: [Tagging] Mapping amenity=prison

2016-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 09 ago 2016, alle ore 18:54, Kevin Kenny > ha scritto: > > What I'm thinking is to put amenity=prison on the whole area and then > barrier=wall or barrier=fence on the enclosure. sounds reasonable to me cheers, Martin