It wouldn't be hard to prove if this conversation is in the public domain.
In the original question, the data use looks much more direct than using it
as a source for directed surveying. And it does look like even this is
expressly forbidden by the user terms of the mentioned website.
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 21 set 2016, alle ore 12:46, joost schouppe
> ha scritto:
>
> Which I think is correct, as Martin's answer also explains.
well, although the collection of facts can be protected against copying,
looking up those facts in a protected source and compare them wit
Dave, well, as I implied, no, I'm not sure.
Janko started a thread in legal-talk where you can expect more
knowledgeable answers. Simon Poole answered, basically, "it depends". Which
I think is correct, as Martin's answer also explains.
Andre Angels, your comment was really uncalled for.
2016-09
On 21/09/2016 07:51, joost schouppe wrote:
Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright
violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that).
Hmm... Are you sure? I (& I'm sure others as well) use UK OS maps to
spot features missing from OSM & then use thos
2016-09-21 11:30 GMT+02:00 Andre Engels :
> That's great nonsense. YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT FACTS ONLY THE
> PRESENTATION OF THOSE FACTS
>
in Europe, databases (and a map can be considered database) are protected
if it took significant work to produce them, even if they are just
compilations of fact
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:51 AM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> Using copyrighted material to spot errors in OSM is still copyright
> violation (well, a specialist in copyright should confirm that).
That's great nonsense. YOU CANNOT COPYRIGHT FACTS ONLY THE
PRESENTATION OF THOSE FACTS
--
André Engels
sorry, ik ben nog een van die ouw zakken die een link niet herkent als
er geen lijntje onderstaat :-)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 8:51 AM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> André,
>
> This isn't about you - this is about project integrity. One lawsuit for
> copyright infringement could be enough to kill the pr
André,
This isn't about you - this is about project integrity. One lawsuit for
copyright infringement could be enough to kill the project. Or we could get
our data users into serious problems. Whether or not you are an excellent
mapper is not the question. It is just not something we can take chan
On 2016-09-17 20:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> André Pirard wrote:
>> Last point is what source:???=Michelin ??? to use to prevent a
>> StijnRR or like arbitrarily destructing well thought out tagging
>> without notifying the author. I suggest
>> source:highway=https://viamichelin.be/web/Cartes-
