Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-24 Thread Greg Troxel
Dave Swarthout writes: > I came across an interesting routing problem the other day. A section of > the Richardson Highway in Alaska was relocated in 2015 by the Alaska DOT in > anticipation of erosion or flooding by the nearby Delta River. However, the > old highway is

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-18 Thread Andre Engels
I would make it unclassified - more generally, in this kind of case I would put the old route at some lower highway level than the new route, exact value depending on the situation (both the relative quality of the roads and the presence or absence of destinations for which the old road would

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-18 Thread André Pirard
Hi, Wouldn't it be appropriate for this kind of discussion to ask routing/GPS programmers like OSMand and Graphhopper etc. what they use for route optimization and what else they would like to use, hence us to do. I always say that the biggest routing problem (some people openly LOL at OSM

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Dave Swarthout
I'm so enamored of the new ESRI imagery I had forgotten to check *all* the available imagery in that area. Thanks, Hans. It appears that not only has some of the old pavement been removed but there is no bridge over the small stream anymore. The highway isn't even continuous. I'll check with Will

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Clifford Snow
The old hwy looks like it is being torn apart in a few area looking at the Digital Globe standard imagery. Track may be more appropriate. On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the new road. Also we have a more up to

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Hans De Kryger
DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery has the new road. Also we have a more up to date map than Google in that area  *Regards,* *Hans* On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > How about =proposed? > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed > > "For

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
How about =proposed? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed "For roads to be removed, use *proposed:highway*=no. This is understood by (at least) ITO's Transport Construction map." " - a further tag could be added to illustrate the expected

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: > I came across an interesting routing problem the other day. A section of > the Richardson Highway in Alaska was relocated in 2015 by the Alaska DOT in > anticipation of erosion or flooding by the nearby Delta

Re: [Tagging] Setting a preferred routing

2017-09-17 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: > Hi, > I came across an interesting routing problem the other day. A section of > the Richardson Highway in Alaska was relocated in 2015 by the Alaska DOT in > anticipation of erosion or flooding by the nearby Delta