Dec 18, 2020, 17:44 by si...@poole.ch:
>
> addr:floor is an address tag and used in -(postal)-addresses- when the
> floor is customarily or required to be included.
>
>
> level:ref is a SIT tag used to indicate the name (or other numbering) of
> a level contrary to the zero based
addr:floor is an address tag and used in -(postal)-addresses- when the
floor is customarily or required to be included.
level:ref is a SIT tag used to indicate the name (or other numbering) of
a level contrary to the zero based number of the level tag.
While both level:ref and addr:floor can
Dec 18, 2020, 14:56 by dieterdre...@gmail.com:
> Am Fr., 18. Dez. 2020 um 14:07 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <>
> matkoni...@tutanota.com> >:
>
>>
>> 4) I am not planning to work on deprecating either one
>>
>
>
> but you are working on cosolidating _both_
>
No, I just researched and
Am Fr., 18. Dez. 2020 um 14:07 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoni...@tutanota.com>:
> 1) both are in use and while level:ref has more uses most of them come
> from mass edits[1]
>
> 2) this edits were intended to document current tagging practice, not to
> create a proposal
>
> 3) addr:floor
1) both are in use and while level:ref has more uses most of them come from
mass edits[1]
2) this edits were intended to document current tagging practice, not to create
a proposal
3) addr:floor went through a proposal[2] and I am not going to mark it as
deprecated
without consultation
4) I
1) this edits were not intended as changing anything but to document current
tagging
practice
2) how Simple Indoor Tagging is being broken by either of this tags?
3) If SIT is broken by that tags, how it can be avoided? Recommending to use
level tag together with either of this two?
Dec 18,
Your edit makes sense, at least as a first step, but we should reflect how
to explain why addr:floor is described as an alternative to level:ref, and
not as a "possible tagging mistake". Are there subtle differences? If not,
I would prefer to choose one and discourage the other. 10.000 uses are
This doesn't make any sense outside of trying breaking the SIT tagging
scheme If you have changes to suggest do that in the context of an SIT
improvement and not just so that you can add yet another SC challenge.
Am 18.12.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging:
I heavily edited
