On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2017-07-21 15:26 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira :
>> It seems a good start :-)
> I have copied some information over from the boundary page and removed the
> redirect, feel free to amend:
>
2017-07-21 15:26 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira :
> It seems a good start :-)
>
>
I have copied some information over from the boundary page and removed the
redirect, feel free to amend:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> What do you think about the draft for a key page (above)?
It seems a good start :-)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
sent from a phone
> On 21. Jul 2017, at 13:52, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> without any previous discussions.
that's the reason why we're discussing now.
What do you think about the draft for a key page (above)?
Cheers,
Martin
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> admittedly there is not much documentation in the wiki, there isn't even a
> key page, only a redirect to boundary=administrative with this paragraph:
(...)
> Besides administrative boundaries, the admin_level=*
sent from a phone
> On 21. Jul 2017, at 03:19, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Complementing, why not just use ownership
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership, operator
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator or something else,
> instead using a tag
sent from a phone
> On 21. Jul 2017, at 03:13, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> But then it opens precedence to use admin_level on any object that has
> some kind of government administration.
>
> For example, schools, hospitals, parks, etc.
for those I'd expect the
Complementing, why not just use ownership
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership, operator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator or something else,
instead using a tag created for borders?
___
Tagging mailing list
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> I don't see a problem to add admin_level on government offices.
>
> If you are looking for boundaries you will have to look for a combination of
> boundary=administrative with a proper admin level (while in the
sent from a phone
> On 18. Jul 2017, at 17:31, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> For me it doesn't look right to appropriate an already well defined
> tag (admin_level) to say that a government office is from a federal
> instance/court, for example.
I don't see a problem to
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
wrote:
> Does it really make sense to have admin_level with office=government
>
I don't think so. I noticed someone's also been adding administrative
boundary relations to university campuses, which seems equally
11 matches
Mail list logo