Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2017-07-21 15:26 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira : >> It seems a good start :-) > I have copied some information over from the boundary page and removed the > redirect, feel free to amend: >

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2017-07-21 15:26 GMT+02:00 Nelson A. de Oliveira : > It seems a good start :-) > > I have copied some information over from the boundary page and removed the redirect, feel free to amend: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level Cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > What do you think about the draft for a key page (above)? It seems a good start :-) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 21. Jul 2017, at 13:52, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > without any previous discussions. that's the reason why we're discussing now. What do you think about the draft for a key page (above)? Cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > admittedly there is not much documentation in the wiki, there isn't even a > key page, only a redirect to boundary=administrative with this paragraph: (...) > Besides administrative boundaries, the admin_level=*

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 21. Jul 2017, at 03:19, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > Complementing, why not just use ownership > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership, operator > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator or something else, > instead using a tag

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-21 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 21. Jul 2017, at 03:13, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > But then it opens precedence to use admin_level on any object that has > some kind of government administration. > > For example, schools, hospitals, parks, etc. for those I'd expect the

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-20 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Complementing, why not just use ownership https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership, operator https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator or something else, instead using a tag created for borders? ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-20 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I don't see a problem to add admin_level on government offices. > > If you are looking for boundaries you will have to look for a combination of > boundary=administrative with a proper admin level (while in the

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 18. Jul 2017, at 17:31, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > > For me it doesn't look right to appropriate an already well defined > tag (admin_level) to say that a government office is from a federal > instance/court, for example. I don't see a problem to

Re: [Tagging] admin_level with office=government

2017-07-18 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Does it really make sense to have admin_level with office=government > I don't think so. I noticed someone's also been adding administrative boundary relations to university campuses, which seems equally