Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
Am Mo., 17. Okt. 2022 um 10:09 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > Oct 16, 2022, 17:30 by annekadis...@web.de:Is there a way to > > implement a warning into the editors not to combine > "archaeological_site" with dinosaurs? I will replace the few I found > with geological=palaeontological_site > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site > ). > > which tag combinations are problematic? > > how many of them? > > we cannot tell until everyone is checked ;-) This is about a tag being applied to a feature where it doesn't apply, and maybe some have additional tags, but many will probably just be wrong (if this should be a common error, around here I never encountered it) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
Oct 16, 2022, 17:30 by annekadis...@web.de:Is there a way to > implement a warning into the editors not to combine > "archaeological_site" with dinosaurs? I will replace the few I found > with geological=palaeontological_site > (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site). > which tag combinations are problematic? how many of them? in general JOSM/iD tend to reject validator warnings affecting less than 1000 elements worldwide at time of adding them (as a rule of thumb) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
I'm just saying it would be nice if the editors (iD, JOSM) would give a warning if someone tries to put dinosaurs within the range of human habitation. On 16/10/2022 18:12, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 16 Oct 2022, at 18:05, Volker Schmidt wrote: Do you have a feeling how many "archeologic" sites in OSM are in reality palaeontological? I fear this is a frequent error, but difficult to spot. It doesn’t seem a huge problem, but even if this was widespread my stance would be to fix these as errors rather than accepting them as consistent use Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
sent from a phone > On 16 Oct 2022, at 18:05, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Do you have a feeling how many "archeologic" sites in OSM are in reality > palaeontological? I fear this is a frequent error, but difficult to spot. It doesn’t seem a huge problem, but even if this was widespread my stance would be to fix these as errors rather than accepting them as consistent use Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
There were 4, tagged as dinosaur trackway or dinosaur footprints or similar. Obviously, even though dinosaurs were quite big, I can't see them on satellite view, so I just changed the key to description and added geological=palaeontological_site. Anne On 16/10/2022 17:02, Volker Schmidt wrote: Do you have a feeling how many "archeologic" sites in OSM are in reality palaeontological? I fear this is a frequent error, but difficult to spot. On Sun, 16 Oct 2022, 17:33 Anne-Karoline Distel, wrote: Hello all, I'm doing a huge tidy-up amongst the values for "site_type", documented in a diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/400151 I've come across a few dinosaur footprints, but that is not archaeology, because archaeology is about man made structures. Is there a way to implement a warning into the editors not to combine "archaeological_site" with dinosaurs? I will replace the few I found with geological=palaeontological_site (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site). Maybe this is the wrong mailing list for it... Anne ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
Do you have a feeling how many "archeologic" sites in OSM are in reality palaeontological? I fear this is a frequent error, but difficult to spot. On Sun, 16 Oct 2022, 17:33 Anne-Karoline Distel, wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm doing a huge tidy-up amongst the values for "site_type", documented > in a diary post: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/400151 > > I've come across a few dinosaur footprints, but that is not archaeology, > because archaeology is about man made structures. Is there a way to > implement a warning into the editors not to combine > "archaeological_site" with dinosaurs? I will replace the few I found > with geological=palaeontological_site > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site > ). > > Maybe this is the wrong mailing list for it... > > Anne > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] dinosaurs
Am So., 16. Okt. 2022 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Anne-Karoline Distel < annekadis...@web.de>: > I've come across a few dinosaur footprints, but that is not archaeology, > because archaeology is about man made structures. Is there a way to > implement a warning into the editors not to combine > "archaeological_site" with dinosaurs? I will replace the few I found > with geological=palaeontological_site > ( > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site > ). > > hm, a single footprint makes it a palaeontological site? Maybe, still I'd go for a footprint tag, on a node or polygon: natural=fossil_track or "ichnite" if it should sound scientific On a way: natural=fossil_trackway or protichnites (a trace / sequencs of tracks) you could then add another tag to specify the kind of beeing that has left the footprint, e.g. with "ichnotaxon"/ichnospecie/ichnogenus or something understandable. > Maybe this is the wrong mailing list for it... all tagging questions are welcome, but you could have also asked on osm-paleontology-talk, if you had created it before ;-) Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
