Javbw
On 7 Dec 2016, at 11:02 AM, Bradley White wrote:
>> Unless being a surface expressway (trunk) or fully controlled freeway
>> (motorway), I tend to qualify anything that averages 7+ lanes as primary,
>> 5-6 lanes as secondary or primary, 4-5 lanes as secondary, 2-3 lanes as
>> tertiary, w
> Unless being a surface expressway (trunk) or fully controlled freeway
> (motorway), I tend to qualify anything that averages 7+ lanes as primary,
> 5-6 lanes as secondary or primary, 4-5 lanes as secondary, 2-3 lanes as
> tertiary, when otherwise not otherwise being a state (secondary) or federal
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Michael Tsang writes:
>
> > There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage,
> resulting in
> > congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary
> > highways together for long distance traffic, but the
2016-11-28 13:39 GMT+01:00 Michael Tsang :
> There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting
> in
> congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary
> highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single
> lane
> per direction,
Michael Tsang writes:
> There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting in
> congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary
> highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single lane
> per direction, with lots of traffic
On Mon Nov 28 12:39:44 2016 GMT, Michael Tsang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> There are some highways which the quality isn't up to the usage, resulting in
> congestion. Those highways connects high-quality motorway/trunk/primary
> highways together for long distance traffic, but they only have a single
