Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way?

sz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> >Sent: Friday, 18 May 2018 01:51 >To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools ><tagging@openstreetmap.org> >Subject: Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way? > > > >17. May 2018 15:11 by osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au &g

Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way?

Looks like it's done on roundabouts in Australia? 2018-05-17 15:11 GMT+02:00 : > I’ve noticed there are 9377 cases of type=route tagged on ways instead of > relations: > > > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/type=route > > > > I’ve been unable to find

Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way?

sent from a phone > On 17. May 2018, at 18:36, > wrote: > > > > So, yeah, I would say that “tagging error” IS in a part defined by data > consumers. > I agree that type on a way is a tagging error, type is kind of

Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way?

and the way data consumers interpret that data. From: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> Sent: Friday, 18 May 2018 01:51 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way? 17. May 2018 15:11

Re: [Tagging] type=route tagged on a way?

17. May 2018 15:11 by osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au : > So my question is, is this type of tagging actually supported by data > consumers, or are these 9000 tagging errors? "tagging error" is not defined by whatever something is used by data