Martin, Rahul
thanks a lot to you both for answers in both threads. Very instructive.
Unfortunately I have to support both versions of JSPs, so SimpleTag is
out of question. I found a neat trick (used in another tag-lib) which
prevented me to support two versions of my code while supporting
Hello, I would love to hear about some taglib theory here.
My understanding is that, when creating a new tag, I can inherit from
either TagSupport or BodyTagSupport
depending on whether I need to manipulate the tag content or not.
For this reason, most of my tags (WALL library) inherit from
Once again, please ask questions about Struts on the Struts mailing
lists, rather than here.
--
Martin Cooper
On 7/23/05, Luca Passani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I would love to hear about some taglib theory here.
My understanding is that, when creating a new tag, I can inherit from
ooops, I felt this was a general taglib question, more than a Struts
question. It only takes struts as an example,
but the question is is there a reason why it makes sense to always
subclass BodyTagSupport in a tag-library?
Luca
Martin Cooper wrote:
Once again, please ask questions about
Luca Passani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/23/2005 02:28:14 PM:
ooops, I felt this was a general taglib question, more than a Struts
question. It only takes struts as an example,
but the question is is there a reason why it makes sense to always
subclass BodyTagSupport in a tag-library?
On 7/23/05, Luca Passani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ooops, I felt this was a general taglib question, more than a Struts
question. It only takes struts as an example,
but the question is is there a reason why it makes sense to always
subclass BodyTagSupport in a tag-library?
Sorry, I read it
On 7/23/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Rahul mentioned SimpleTagSupport, and that would have been nice, but
that came along long after the Struts tags, and indeed the Struts tags
still need to support earlier versions of JSP.
Yes, ofcourse.
Luca - I probably should've
