How to get request parameter using c taglib ?

2002-03-25 Thread RAYMOND Romain
helloo, Specs indicate c:out value=${request:myparameter}/ to do an equivalent to request.getParameter(myparameter) but it is not good ... Have you the right syntax ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to get request parameter using c taglib ?

2002-03-25 Thread John Baker
On Monday 25 Mar 2002 14H:43 pm, you wrote: helloo, Specs indicate c:out value=${request:myparameter}/ That looks like request:myparameter not request . myparameter, note the full stop. You want request.myparameter. to do an equivalent to request.getParameter(myparameter) but it is not

Re: How to get request parameter using c taglib ?

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn Bayern
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, RAYMOND Romain wrote: Specs indicate c:out value=${request:myparameter}/ to do an equivalent to request.getParameter(myparameter) but it is not good ... Have you the right syntax ? The current specs don't say that. Are you reading documentation that's out of date?

Re: failure of c:import

2002-03-25 Thread Shawn Bayern
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Biske, Todd wrote: Is there a way using c:catch or some other mechanism to trap exceptional HTTP response codes, e.g. 4xx and 50x codes and perform action on them? When using this tag for include portlets from other contexts, it would seem that this type of functionality

position() function always returns 0

2002-03-25 Thread Volcoff, Ari
for the following xml file: test.xml ?xml version=1.0? test hello bye /bye /hello /test when running the xtags taglibs that use xalan in the following manner: test.jsp xtags:parse uri=test.xml / xtags:stylesheet

Re: How to get request parameter using c taglib ?

2002-03-25 Thread RAYMOND Romain
ba ba ba bah :) John Baker a écrit : On Monday 25 Mar 2002 17H:58 pm, you wrote: On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, RAYMOND Romain wrote: Specs indicate c:out value=${request:myparameter}/ to do an equivalent to request.getParameter(myparameter) but it is not good ... Have you the right