Re: Sybil attack?

2015-02-16 Thread Natanael
Den 16 feb 2015 12:53 skrev Adonay Sanz adonay.s...@gmail.com: Hi Natanael Thanks for answering. Really I'm noob in this area. I wanted to use I2P version. So, it's no possible way present or future to block it? It's a really threat? Can you explainme better what it means configured to mimic

Re: tahoe-dev Digest, Vol 95, Issue 9

2015-02-16 Thread ihave2p
://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20150216/9149cba4/attachment-0001.html -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:14:27 +0100 From: Natanael natanae...@gmail.com To: Adonay Sanz adonay.s...@gmail.com Cc: tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org Subject: Re: Sybil

Sybil attack?

2015-02-16 Thread Adonay Sanz
Hi, I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution? Thanks for answer Cheers! Adonay Sanz ___ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org

Re: Sybil attack?

2015-02-16 Thread Natanael
Den 16 feb 2015 11:42 skrev Adonay Sanz adonay.s...@gmail.com: Hi, I'm reading your documentation and has Tahoe-LAFS any sybil attack protection? or does it really matter? Can be implemented some solution? Tahoe-LAFS in the default configuration don't rely on unknown nodes, so there Sybil

Re: Sybil attack?

2015-02-16 Thread Adonay Sanz
Hi Natanael Thanks for answering. Really I'm noob in this area. I wanted to use I2P version. So, it's no possible way present or future to block it? It's a really threat? Can you explainme better what it means configured to mimic Freenet? Thanks a lot Adonay 2015-02-16 12:14 GMT+01:00