Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Brian Warner
On 10/14/11 10:57 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: > There is custom magic in setup.py that creates bin/tahoe using a > shebang for the interpreter that ran setup.py; Right, bin/tahoe is the only entry point, so it's the only script that needs this treatment. > but the Makefile just does this: >

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
On 14/10/11 18:38, Greg Troxel wrote: > Sounds good. It should probably be using what autoconf would call > @PYTHON@; on pkgsrc there is no 'python', because it would end up > referring to something possibly different than you found at configure > time. But bin/tahoe gets this right, so it seems

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Marco Tedaldi
On 14.10.2011 19:22, Brian Warner wrote: > On 10/14/11 8:04 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > >> Thanks for 1) making the unpacked dir match the version in the file and > > Glad that helps.. it's part of the tarball-generation automation, so it > should always work that way. > >> I am assuming while a ne

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
On 14/10/11 16:04, Greg Troxel wrote: > I did get the following complaints when building: > > => Checking for non-existent script interpreters in tahoe-lafs-1.9.0b1 > WARNING: [check-interpreter.mk] The interpreter "/usr/bin/env" of > "[...]/allmydata/test/check_grid.py" is not allowed. > WARNIN

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Troxel
Correct. The dependency is actually going to be driven by Twisted. Tahoe (both current 1.8.3 and upcoming 1.9.0) is happy with both current Foolscap-0.6.1 and upcoming Foolscap-0.6.2 . Both current Foolscap-0.6.1 and upcoming Foolscap-0.6.2 are happy with current Twisted-11.0.0 . But cur

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Brian Warner
On 10/14/11 8:04 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > Thanks for 1) making the unpacked dir match the version in the file and Glad that helps.. it's part of the tarball-generation automation, so it should always work that way. > I am assuming while a new foolscap release is pending, 1.9.0 will not > require

Re: [tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Troxel
http://tahoe-lafs.org/source/tahoe-lafs/tarballs/allmydata-tahoe-1.9.0b1.tar.gz Thanks for 1) making the unpacked dir match the version in the file and 2) having the path be close to the release path; both of these make pre-testing as a pkgsrc entry easier and closer to what I'll commit when t

[tahoe-dev] 1.9.0 beta1 is tagged!

2011-10-14 Thread Brian Warner
We fixed the last major MDMF blocker tonight (#1561), so we're finally clear to tag beta1. This means the web-API and CLI arguments are stable, and we're comfortable with supporting them for a while. The changes since alpha2 are pretty minor: * CLI: use "tahoe put --format=MDMF" to create an MD