On Jul 30, 2011, at 4:50, Greg Troxel wrote:
In your worldview, are there multiple WUIs? I can see the desire to
use tahoe as a backing store for a web server, but until there are
redundant WUIs and the client can select among them - I don't see the
point compared to just running apache
Dear Kevin:
Your letter fills me with internal conflict!
On the one hand I'm delighted because what you propose is not only the
best way to further protect against the dangers of looking at files
stored inTahoe-LAFS through a web browser, but it also opens up the
possibility of even better
On 7/29/11 5:39 PM, Kevin Reid wrote:
Given the two origins, the only way you are in danger is if you have
two “raw” (from origin #2) documents open in your browser at once
The tab's history is also an angle of attack, so I think another danger
is to open two different documents in sequence in
