Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Linux kernel shipped in upcoming 0.7.x

2011-04-28 Thread anonym
28/04/11 16:24, intrigeri: > Hi, > >> => I'm in favour of waiting at least for #1 to be resolved on the >> Debian side. Regarding #2 I'm undecided. May be worth asking the >> Debian Virtualbox Team for their plans about maintaining backports for >> Squeeze. > > Sorry, I realize I was unclear. I'm

Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Linux kernel shipped in upcoming 0.7.x

2011-04-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, > => I'm in favour of waiting at least for #1 to be resolved on the > Debian side. Regarding #2 I'm undecided. May be worth asking the > Debian Virtualbox Team for their plans about maintaining backports for > Squeeze. Sorry, I realize I was unclear. I'm in favour of releasing 0.7.1 with the

Re: [T(A)ILS-dev] Linux kernel shipped in upcoming 0.7.x

2011-04-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, CAN Consulting wrote (27 Apr 2011 14:49:30 GMT) : > There's at least one critical bug in 2.6.38 which I can confirm on > all devices I tested (x86 and x86_64 arch). IMO it makes 2.6.38 > unusable for the time being. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/%2Bsource/linux/%2Bbug/760131 > The main