Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:53:38AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: This does look awesome! Thanks I agree ;) It requires to use jruby, as sikuli is java. But there might be other ways to implement it. Just curious: is this requirement brought in by the sikuli gem? Totally, because sikuli is

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:59:14AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Tiny remark: I think we could drop the last features component of features/cucumber/features/, so that features/cucumber/features/iceweasel/torified_browsing.feature becomes features/cucumber/iceweasel/torified_browsing.feature

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread bertagaz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:39:17PM +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:53:38AM +0200, intrigeri wrote: Have you by chance found a way to *emulate* a USB 2.0 device in software? (qemu-kvm from current Debian testing/sid supports USB 2.0 passthrough, but

Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-dev] [GSoC] Tails Server

2012-06-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, jvoisin wrote (19 Jun 2012 01:53:43 GMT) : I am sorry but I won't be able to pursue/achieve my GSoC[1] for personal reasons that I prefer not disclose on a public mailing list. Sorry about this. I hope things will be better for you soon. If we can help, please feel free to ask. I'd

Re: [Tails-dev] automated tests

2012-06-19 Thread intrigeri
berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (19 Jun 2012 11:39:17 GMT) : Also, I'm unsure about where the build happen. Do you mean where the tests are run from, or anything else? Yep, builds and tests are supposed to be started in the same system. Why? (In the setup we had in mind for the upcoming