Re: [Tails-dev] Please review (and merge?) feature/better_power_off_button

2012-11-28 Thread anonym
22/11/12 13:51, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (20 Nov 2012 16:48:45 GMT) : Please review the branch feature/better_power_off_button. (WAN here) Please update the two relevant tickets so that their state matches the current state of things. Done. Cheers!

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review (and merge?) feature/better_power_off_button

2012-11-28 Thread anonym
28/11/12 02:15, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (20 Nov 2012 16:48:45 GMT) : * Do we want to configure gnome-screensaver in some particular way? Currently it starts the Blank screen screen saver after 5 minutes of idling, without locking the screen. Is this affected by the problem described

Re: [Tails-dev] config/chroot_local-packages in .gitignore?

2012-11-28 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (23 Nov 2012 18:29:58 GMT) : I definitely think we should remove it from .gitignore. Done in devel, then. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review (and merge?) feature/better_power_off_button

2012-11-28 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (28 Nov 2012 13:51:03 GMT) : Is this affected by the problem described in https://tails.boum.org/todo/deactivate_screensaver_until_time_is_set/ ? Probably, but I don't know. I cannot find a way to reproduce it reliably by playing with `date -s`, neither with gnome-screensaver or

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review (and merge?) feature/better_power_off_button

2012-11-28 Thread anonym
28/11/12 16:28, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (28 Nov 2012 13:51:03 GMT) : Is this affected by the problem described in https://tails.boum.org/todo/deactivate_screensaver_until_time_is_set/ ? Probably, but I don't know. I cannot find a way to reproduce it reliably by playing with `date

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review (and merge?) feature/better_power_off_button

2012-11-28 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (28 Nov 2012 15:42:23 GMT) : 28/11/12 16:28, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (28 Nov 2012 13:51:03 GMT) : Is this affected by the problem described in https://tails.boum.org/todo/deactivate_screensaver_until_time_is_set/ ? Probably, but I don't know. I cannot find a way to

Re: [Tails-dev] Faking htpdate user agent worth it?

2012-11-28 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (Let's get rid of this old stalled discussion and free some mental space of ours.) intrigeri wrote (21 Oct 2012 08:57:55 GMT) : anonym wrote (15 Oct 2012 13:14:24 GMT) : OTOH it becomes easier to fingerprint Tails users on their side of the pipe, which arguably is worse. Three *full*

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and test feature/tordate

2012-11-28 Thread intrigeri
hi, (Let's kill this old stalled discussion, and free some mental space of ours.) intrigeri wrote (24 Sep 2012 10:11:59 GMT) : anonym wrote (06 Feb 2012 14:24:31 GMT) : [...] It turned out that if we want a long, stable Tor session with a time only handled by tordate (like when htpdate

Re: [Tails-dev] Faking htpdate user agent worth it?

2012-11-28 Thread adrelanos
intrigeri: This page reads fingerprinting based on the known traffic pattern when fetching the full page of any of the members of Tails' HTP source pools is not possible; I've always understood, in this sentence, the full page as meaning the page + all external resources it requires. Ping?

Re: [Tails-dev] Faking htpdate user agent worth it?

2012-11-28 Thread adrelanos
adrelanos: intrigeri: This page reads fingerprinting based on the known traffic pattern when fetching the full page of any of the members of Tails' HTP source pools is not possible; I've always understood, in this sentence, the full page as meaning the page + all external resources it