The current official Debian position on security regarding unstable and
stable:
Q: How is security handled for unstable?
A: The short answer is: it's not. Unstable is a rapidly moving target
and the security team does not have the resources needed to properly
support it. If you want to have a
On 07/09/13 14:44, carmie wrote:
I'm sorry for my silence, I'm not speaking english very well, to write
you all is impressive for me and I was busy in august.
Hi again, I'm sorry you feel impressed! I find your English perfectly
fine for us to communicate.
Here [1] is the last version of the
I fear that OS developer may be too specific and needlessly
excluding many people who don't identify as OS developers.
Software developer, perhaps?
Good idea.
We don't have anything to put under Designer for the moment but we
might at some point.
We do, see my previous email :)
I'm not
On 14/09/13 17:06, Alan wrote:
I think we must find a way to group this, as a category with only one
item is kindof useless. I think that a category should have 2 to 4/5
items.
I disagree here. I don't see this work are try only trying to come up
with categories to order a bunch of links. Now
intrigeri:
Andreas Kuckartz wrote (16 Sep 2013 08:04:44 GMT) :
But my empirical observations are that this has not been true for
several years now: Debian unstable has been promptly supported with
security fixes.
Well, yes and no. It is correct that Debian unstable is not supported
by the
We don't have anything to put under Designer for the moment but we
might at some point.
We do, see my previous email :)
[...] Are you talking about the page Improve the Tails website
that we could put under this role?
Yes, that was what I meant (since you previously mentionned that we
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 07:07:06PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
= please review feature/linux-3.10.1, and merge it into devel.
Reviewed, tested successfully, so merged into devel.
Congrats!
bert.
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
Hi,
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (16 Sep 2013 11:33:42 GMT) :
On 14/09/13 17:06, Alan wrote:
I think we must find a way to group this, as a category with only one
item is kindof useless. I think that a category should have 2 to 4/5
items.
I disagree here. I don't see this work are try only
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (16 Sep 2013 12:03:37 GMT) :
If we believe the same error message is printed out when the
live-media=removable trick needs to be used then we can described them
at the beginning of a step 5:
« if the error message is xxx then, try to remove the
I had a look at the work done on the doc/cold-boot-attack branch. I'm
very happy to see new people taking initiatives regarding the
documentation lately. I pushed it to the main repo.
Regarding the structure, I felt that it was talking about two things
that could be better separated or
Brilliant, i'll forward this on
Apologies for the CC'ed email (tails-dev@boum.org), it was an extra
address your colleague sent me earlier...
Many thanks
On 14/09/2013 at 1:01 PM, Alan wrote:Hi,
2 Questions please:
You're currently asking on the public tails development mailing list.
I'll
11 matches
Mail list logo
