Re: [Tails-dev] Sharing code for offline doc browsing? [

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:24:44 GMT) : > Please re-read the commit comment, and the comment in the code added in > the commit. OK, got it. Sorry for the noise. > [...] While your refactoring remark still stands, I'd rather spend > my limited time on getting this feature mergable first. Agreed

Re: [Tails-dev] Localization of help in the greeter [

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:25:40 GMT) : > For a first release even I could "translate" the language code in the > url part, leaving "Help" untranslated so we don't get something funny > sounding. OTOH, that'd make the whole string appear as "translated"; > would this perhaps prevent our tran

Re: [Tails-dev] Serious reliability issues? [

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:24:32 GMT) : > I managed to reproduce it after a couple of reboots and, unsurprisingly, > it's a race condition. See commit 4df28d9 for more info. Congrats! Why set a 5 seconds timeout to udevadm --settle, instead of the default 120 seconds? > If that doesn't fix it

Re: [Tails-dev] [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:25:32 GMT) : > 21/11/13 19:27, intrigeri wrote: >> anonym wrote (21 Nov 2013 05:58:37 GMT) : >>> For consistency I also >>> added similar help links for persistence and "more options" in the first >>> screen, although this easily can be reverted if not desired. >>

Re: [Tails-dev] active probing vs. AdvGoalTracking [

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:26:58 GMT) : > 21/11/13 13:50, intrigeri wrote: >>> However, what do we expect here? In grand GNOME tradition, I can't >>> imagine this is configurable right now. Worse, even if we write patches >>> that make it so and send them upstream, I doubt we'll get it upstreamed

Re: [Tails-dev] disabling MAC spoofing by default in VM's [

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (25 Nov 2013 19:24:51 GMT) : > 21/11/13 09:17, intrigeri wrote: >> I'm concerned about the impact on our test suite: it seems suboptimal >> to (automatically) test code paths that are different from the ones >> most users will go through. > Even if we add a comprehensive cucumber

Re: [Tails-dev] active probing vs. AdvGoalTracking [Was: [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails]

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
21/11/13 13:50, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, >> However, what do we expect here? In grand GNOME tradition, I can't >> imagine this is configurable right now. Worse, even if we write patches >> that make it so and send them upstream, I doubt we'll get it upstreamed >> within the next couple of *years*. Fr

Re: [Tails-dev] [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
21/11/13 19:27, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (21 Nov 2013 05:58:37 GMT) : >> For consistency I also >> added similar help links for persistence and "more options" in the first >> screen, although this easily can be reverted if not desired. > > TBH I see little use in this button: the documentat

Re: [Tails-dev] Localization of help in the greeter [Was: [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails]

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
23/11/13 00:07, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (21 Nov 2013 05:58:37 GMT) : >> 04/11/13 14:49, intrigeri wrote: >>> anonym wrote (24 Oct 2013 14:34:01 GMT) : 19/10/13 18:53, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (09 Oct 2013 16:32:25 GMT) : >> ## Documentation access in Tails Greet

Re: [Tails-dev] disabling MAC spoofing by default in VM's [Was: [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails]

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
21/11/13 09:17, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (Splitting into per-topic sub-threads to make the discussion easier > to follow.) > > anonym wrote (21 Nov 2013 05:58:37 GMT) : >> As pointed out in a different part of this thread, some virtual machines >> don't like MAC spoofing at all (e.g. in Virtual

Re: [Tails-dev] Serious reliability issues? [Was: [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails]

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
22/11/13 23:47, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > I've just booted a ThinkPad X201 a few times on Tails/experimental > (that should have the latest and greatest feature/spoof-mac in, if > I understood clearly). Here are my (slightly disappointing) results: > > * the MAC address for my wired ethernet (in

Re: [Tails-dev] Sharing code for offline doc browsing? [Was: [RFC] Design (and prototype) for MAC spoofing in Tails]

2013-11-25 Thread anonym
23/11/13 00:14, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (21 Nov 2013 05:58:37 GMT) : >> 04/11/13 14:49, intrigeri wrote: >>> anonym wrote (24 Oct 2013 14:34:01 GMT) : 19/10/13 18:53, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (09 Oct 2013 16:32:25 GMT) : >> ## Documentation access in Tails Greet

Re: [Tails-dev] Shutdown stopped working in nightly experimental?

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
winterfa...@riseup.net wrote (23 Nov 2013 12:36:11 GMT) : > intrigeri wrote: >> winterfairy at riseup.net wrote (22 Nov 2013 12:23:14 GMT) : >>> It seems "Shutdown immediately" and "Reboot immediately" both reboots the >>> system in current nightly builds of experimental. >> >> I can't reproduce th

[Tails-dev] Two new easy liveusb-creator tasks [Was: Please review'n'merge liveusb-creator's bugfix/dont-fail-upgrade-if-tmp-dir-exists-on-destination]

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Alan wrote (25 Nov 2013 13:46:54 GMT) : > OK that's another bug: if not self.live.existing_live_os, it tries to > copy a new liveos without confirmation and without removing tmp. FTR, the two bugs discovered when testing this patch are #6437 and #6438, that should be easily fixed by anyone who has

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review whisperback:a4dfd008

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Alan wrote (25 Nov 2013 13:25:23 GMT) : > On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:24:49 +0100 > intrigeri wrote: >> I find it slightly disturbing to see regexp changes without any single >> example (be it in the commit message, some design doc, or executable >> specification^W^Wtest suite) of what strings are new

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge liveusb-creator's bugfix/dont-fail-upgrade-if-tmp-dir-exists-on-destination

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:56:53 + Alan wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:59:29 +0100 intrigeri > wrote: > > yet another incremental merge request for incremental updates :) > > > > please review'n'merge the > > bugfix/dont-fail-upgrade-if-tmp-dir-exists-on-destination branch > > into ma

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/disable-dpms

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
Hi, On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:54:25 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > in bugfix/disable-dpms I dare workaround'ing #5617, now that some > random person on IRC, who was affected by this problem and understood > our position, nicely bothered to test and confirm that the underlying > problem is properly fixed i

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review whisperback:a4dfd008

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:24:49 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > Alan wrote (24 Nov 2013 12:51:10 GMT) : > > # IPs > > -log_string = re.sub(r'\<([\d]{1,3}\.){3}[\d]{1,3}\>', > > +log_string = re.sub(r'([\d]{1,3}\.){3}[\d]{1,3}', > > r'[IP REMOVED]', > >

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge liveusb-creator's bugfix/dont-fail-upgrade-if-tmp-dir-exists-on-destination

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
Hi, On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:59:29 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > yet another incremental merge request for incremental updates :) > > please review'n'merge the > bugfix/dont-fail-upgrade-if-tmp-dir-exists-on-destination branch into > master, in the liveusb-creator Git repository. This is a one-word > c

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/safer-persistence (0.22 iteration)

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2013 12:25:30 GMT) : > Well, the only change was merging devel into it [...] + merging feature/additional-software-dont-check-conf-twice into it, since they go together, it passed code review, and I expected you to test it eventually at some point anyway (see the dedicated

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/safer-persistence (0.22 iteration)

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Alan wrote (25 Nov 2013 12:05:53 GMT) : > I would be ready to merge the branch as of 4492d8b, but as its head > has changed, I have to rebuild and redo some tests, which I find quite > annoying... Well, the only change was merging devel into it to make your review easier, which gives the same resu

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge bugfix/safer-persistence (0.22 iteration)

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:19:20 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > intrigeri wrote (23 Nov 2013 17:36:32 GMT) : > > Going to first try and reproduce it, then have a quick look at > > live-boot's code, and investigate. I hope I'm able to propose a fix > > by the end of the week-end.. > > Reproduced, fully unde

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/ff24

2013-11-25 Thread Alan
Hi, On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:00:16 +0100 intrigeri wrote: > Alan wrote (24 Nov 2013 15:05:50 GMT) : > > - I'm not convinced by the folowing change > > in config/chroot_apt/preferences > > > +Package: * > > +Pin: origin mozilla.debian.net > > +Pin-Priority: 990 > > > If I'm not mistaken,

Re: [Tails-dev] [Secure-testing-commits] r24422 - data

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (25 Nov 2013 06:38:44 GMT) : > Author: carnil > Date: 2013-11-25 06:38:44 + (Mon, 25 Nov 2013) > New Revision: 24422 > Modified: >data/dsa-needed.txt > Log: > Will try to take care of nss release (both wheezy and squeeze packages are > prepared)

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review whisperback:a4dfd008

2013-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Alan wrote (24 Nov 2013 12:51:10 GMT) : > # IPs > -log_string = re.sub(r'\<([\d]{1,3}\.){3}[\d]{1,3}\>', > +log_string = re.sub(r'([\d]{1,3}\.){3}[\d]{1,3}', > r'[IP REMOVED]', > log_string) > # MAC addresses > -log_string = re

Re: [Tails-dev] Release schedule for Tails 0.22

2013-11-25 Thread bertagaz
Hi, Given Alan is in a review'n'merge hell of a mood, I'm committing to the following: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:49:35PM +, Alan wrote: > Hi, > > > intrigeri wrote (24 Sep 2013 17:51:54 GMT) : > > > * feature/incremental-upgrades: I should have a beta ready to be > > reviewed'n'merge

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review whisperback:a4dfd008

2013-11-25 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:51:10PM +, Alan wrote: > Please review the following commit in whisperback master (yes, I know > it's bad to work on master...) > > commit a4dfd008a9b11c9f6d41d4e25de891c21af6d235 > Author: Tails developers > Date: Tue Oct 29 14:15:05 2013 + > > More