Hi,
my name is EPTO. I am the founder of OnionMail.info project.
OnionMail is a mail server using the tor network to increase the privacy
of mail communications and strong cryptography to protect the server
against theft. http://onionmail.info/paper.html
There is a little related project build in
Hi,
Alan wrote (11 Jun 2014 22:24:26 GMT) :
> I'm sorry but most of this polishing job consists of doing unsupported
> things... so failed to find a cleaner way and doubt it exists yet for
> most issues that were identified.
Fully understood. I can feel your pain :/
> I think the palm of the wor
12/06/14 02:21, anonym wrote:
> 12/06/14 00:12, Alan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:37:04 +0200
>> intrigeri wrote:
>>> anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 15:40:13 GMT) :
10/06/14 22:01, intrigeri wrote:
>>>
> Regarding #7382 ("Customized icon are way too small in the
> application
11/06/14 19:37, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 15:40:13 GMT) :
- bugfix/7325-task-list-icons
>>>
>>> The icon assigned to Claws Mail icon is much smaller than one assigned
>>> to Pidgin, which is itself a bit smaller than the one assigned to the
>>> web browser. Is it the same on
12/06/14 00:12, Alan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:37:04 +0200
> intrigeri wrote:
>> anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 15:40:13 GMT) :
>>> 10/06/14 22:01, intrigeri wrote:
>>
Regarding #7382 ("Customized icon are way too small in the
applications menu"), I'm a bit surprised it's not a
12/06/14 01:37, anonym wrote:
> Blockers (children of #6342):
[...]
> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7403
Sorry, that one is a non-blocker.
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubs
12/06/14 00:16, Alan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> At first glance, the icon assigned to the Pidgin discussion window
>>> seems too familiar to me to have been adapted for Windows, but I've
>>> not bothered comparing.
>>
>> Alant, have you looked if it is possible to change that window's icon
>> as well?
>>
Hi,
anonym wrote (29 May 2014 05:49:08 GMT) :
> 2014-07-03 Officially release Tails 1.1~rc1.
For the record, there will be a Wheezy point-release on July 12th.
Too bad we won't have it in the RC, but no big deal: I don't remember
a Debian stable point-release breaking anything for us.
(Did I
Hi,
anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 22:15:58 GMT) :
> 28/05/14 20:18, intrigeri wrote:
>> anonym wrote (28 May 2014 16:40:02 GMT) :
>>> Since I'm still around at this time (until and including the 18th of
>>> June) I'm also able to prepare a 1.1~beta2.
>>
>> Great.
> I'll *try* my best to do this, but
10/06/14 13:47, Alan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I belive the blockers are now fixed.
>
> Please review and merge again feature/6342-update-camouflage-for-gnome3
> into devel, or if you prefer review and merge the following specific
> branches (each fixing the bug whose number is in its name):
I'll go with
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 19:37:04 +0200
intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 15:40:13 GMT) :
> > 10/06/14 22:01, intrigeri wrote:
>
> >> Regarding #7382 ("Customized icon are way too small in the
> >> applications menu"), I'm a bit surprised it's not a blocker.
>
[...]
>
> Fair enough.
Hi,
> Looks good (well, looks ugly, but apparently it's the way it shall
> be :)
>
I'm sorry but most of this polishing job consists of doing unsupported
things... so failed to find a cleaner way and doubt it exists yet for
most issues that were identified.
I think the palm of the worse tweak is
Hi,
> > At first glance, the icon assigned to the Pidgin discussion window
> > seems too familiar to me to have been adapted for Windows, but I've
> > not bothered comparing.
>
> Alant, have you looked if it is possible to change that window's icon
> as well?
>
Yes it is possible. But I'm not su
28/05/14 20:18, intrigeri wrote:
> anonym wrote (28 May 2014 16:40:02 GMT) :
>> 28/05/14 16:28, intrigeri wrote:
>>> * Around June 16, *maybe* put out a 1.1~beta2, that has gone through
>>> the automated test suite, but not the manual one. If we feel it's
>>> useful, and depending on othe
anonym wrote (29 May 2014 05:49:08 GMT) :
> Please let me know ASAP, intrigeri, if something in the above seems
> incorrect! If you ACK it, I'll update the calendar.
Full ACK! (after some clarification wrt. who does what exactly, done on IRC)
___
Tails-d
Hi,
anonym wrote (11 Jun 2014 15:40:13 GMT) :
> 10/06/14 22:01, intrigeri wrote:
>> Regarding #7382 ("Customized icon are way too small in the
>> applications menu"), I'm a bit surprised it's not a blocker.
> It's getting less clear for me what we mean with "blocker". If it means
> that we would
10/06/14 14:28, Alan wrote:
> And all this is blocked by
> https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/7329:
> "Windows 8 camouflage breaks the Unsafe Browser"
> assigned to anonym. anonym will you take care of it?
It's in progress now, see the ticket.
___
Tail
10/06/14 22:01, intrigeri wrote:
> Alan wrote (10 Jun 2014 11:47:56 GMT) :
>> I belive the blockers are now fixed.
>
> Congrats!
>
> The following comes from testing an ISO built from commit 6b4e7908.
> I've *not* looked at the code. anonym, if you don't think you can look
> at the code within 24
Hi,
applied, tested, released as Tails Greeter 0.8 (the migration to
Wheezy deserves a version bump), and moved
GdmGreeter_remove_media=removable.patch from the main Git repo to the
Greeter's one. Merged into testing, devel and experimental.
Congrats!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ http
Hi!
= news =
Did some work on this... Link:
https://github.com/adrelanos/wiperamFreepto
Package builds fine. ./build script produces deterministic
wiperam_0.1.orig.tar.gz, wiperam_0.1-1_all.deb and
wiperam_0.1-1.debian.tar.gz.
Package installation and actual functionality untested.
= copyright
Hi William & others,
William Waites wrote (11 Jun 2014 07:50:02 GMT) :
> Fair enough. Actually at that point I'd probably go back to my odd
> habit of using emacs for mail -- I'm probably not really your target
> user here!
You're certainly part of our target userbase, although probably not of
th
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:03:57 +0200
intrigeri wrote:
> I doubt we would ever have included Mutt... More software means more
> maintenance work, a potentially larger attack surface, and more
> anonymity/privacy concerns to take care of. IMO, we should drop Mutt
> at some point. But feel free to add
22 matches
Mail list logo
