Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge: 1.3] feature/8725-remove-vagrant-bootstrap-cache

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 23/01/15 12:16, intrigeri wrote: hi, anonym wrote (23 Jan 2015 10:34:47 GMT) : This kills the bootstrap stage caching feature in our Vagrant setup, which is considered harmful. Please review and merge into devel! The code looks good to me. Who in here still has a working Vagrant-based

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time [Was: RFC: Use homogenous Debian mirrors at build time (#8726)]

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 26/01/15 12:31, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please review'n'merge: 1. feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time (main Git repo) into all branches we build automatically, namely stable, devel, experimental and feature/jessie = that's for the RM, unless he

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] bugfix/8699-only-create-timestamps-in-Jenkins

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 19/01/15 14:16, intrigeri wrote: Hi, since the .{src,bin}pkgs stuff was merged, our build system is leaving .{start,end}.timestamp files around, which are useless in most cases. anonym has complained about it, so here's a branch that only generates these files when building from Jenkins.

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time [

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 26/01/15 20:04, intrigeri wrote: anonym wrote (26 Jan 2015 13:56:44 GMT) : Merged! I think you forgot to push stable, experimental and feature/jessie after merging into these branches as requested. Sorry, I completely forgot about stable and feature/jessie, and hadn't pushed my

Re: [Tails-dev] Automated builds specification

2015-01-26 Thread bertagaz
Hi, On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:14:55PM +0100, bertagaz wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 08:07:46PM +, sajolida wrote: bertagaz: 0. We might also want a mechanism for devs to pro-actively state they want to keep their branches being build even if the last commit was older than the

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge: 1.3] feature/8725-remove-vagrant-bootstrap-cache

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (26 Jan 2015 12:32:55 GMT) : So a `lb clean --all` will remove the built wiki etc. The Vagrant build script is actually quite clever in that it *will* reuse any cached wiki, which can save a couple minutes of build time. I personally find this quite useful. Good to know, thanks!

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time [

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (26 Jan 2015 13:56:44 GMT) : I thought it best I took it, since it modifies some Vagrant stuff, which I seem to be the maintainer of. Indeed, I had to push two small fixes (commits 535abed and a7d4c9c) to repair the provisioning script. Thanks! Merged! I think you forgot

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] bugfix/8257-more-robust-tor_bootstrap_progress

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 27/11/14 22:35, intrigeri wrote: hi, I've noticed that bug thanks to the Journal capturing such error output on Tails/Jessie, but it affects Wheezy too. We're using the affected function in tor-has-bootstrapped, that some users can run with passwordless sudo, so better make it more

Re: [Tails-dev] AdBlock Plus in Tails' Tor Browser

2015-01-26 Thread bertagaz
Hi, This answer might pop up late now that #8665 is in Ready for QA state, still it might bring new questions. Sorry for that. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:49:10AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: mercedes508 wrote (22 Jan 2015 17:54:53 GMT) : And I'm wondering how important the fingerrint issue is,

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking upstream AppArmor profile

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
hi, bertagaz wrote (25 Jan 2015 12:14:21 GMT) : While I think I could help with maintaining this profile when it breaks the build, I'm not much comfortable with this option from my CI hat point of view. It means that every devs would be notified of this breakage if/when automatic builds will

Re: [Tails-dev] RFC: Use homogenous Debian mirrors at build time (#8726)

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (19 Jan 2015 12:31:29 GMT) : So, I want to: 1. hard-code in auto/config all mirrors that shall be used at build time 2. update vagrant/provision/setup-tails-builder so that it doesn't configure LB_*MIRROR*, and deconfigures them if present 3. update

Re: [Tails-dev] Hybrid ISOs: need to reconsider the plan (#8510)

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Alan wrote (18 Jan 2015 13:40:37 GMT) : I prefer option C: [...] Thoughts? A week later, I've removed the indication that #8510 is blocked by #8524. I'm fine with option C especially if as much people as possible try booting isohybrid DVDs on various computers. Agreed. Created #8797

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.3] feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time [Was: RFC: Use homogenous Debian mirrors at build time (#8726)]

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, please review'n'merge: 1. feature/8726-use-homogenous-Debian-mirrors-at-build-time (main Git repo) into all branches we build automatically, namely stable, devel, experimental and feature/jessie = that's for the RM, unless he explicitly asks for help reviewing the pile of stuff

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking upstream AppArmor profile

2015-01-26 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (25 Jan 2015 08:50:32 GMT) : u wrote (24 Jan 2015 19:54:11 GMT) : Do you want to point me at the Tails-specific patch so I can see what we are talking about? I'll do that once I have implemented it as a patch. In the meantime:

Re: [Tails-dev] Sandboxing Tor Browser: strategy for tracking upstream AppArmor profile

2015-01-26 Thread anonym
On 23/01/15 20:50, intrigeri wrote: Hi, I'm working on #5525 (Sandbox the web browser), and have an AppArmor profile that works locally for most basic use cases. Now, I'm wondering how to integrate it into Tails and I need your input. This profile was derived from the one I've worked a