Hi,
sajolida:
> u:
>> sajolida:
>>> sajolida:
In the process of reworking globally the bootstrapping workflow for
Tails, we brainstormed, together with tchou, on the idea of further
automating the ISO verification process.
>>> Tails Installer
>>> ---
>>>
>>> https://tai
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:47:51PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 14:37:56 GMT) :
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:22:45AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> >> Here's one more: the proposed notification mechanism makes sense to me
> >> for topic branches. But for "base" branches, it's
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 04:39:22PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 12:03:12 GMT) :
> > Ack, sounds reasonable. However from what I've seen, it sometimes means a
> > lot of branches so I wonder if we scaled our infra enough for that, as we
> > didn't include this branches
Hi,
See the ticket for details, in particular from comment #16 and on.
Please review and merge into devel and testing.
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send
On 19/02/15 15:34, intrigeri wrote:
> Anyhow: now fixed, please review'n'merge :)
Merged!
Cheers!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
tails-dev
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:32:59PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> bertagaz wrote (16 Feb 2015 14:32:57 GMT) :
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:49:02PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>
> > That's a logical awesome idea I'm ashamed not to have had sooner.
> > Still, it seems that it comes too late, after som
On Thu 2015-02-19 06:25:35 -0500, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (18 Feb 2015 23:50:20 GMT) :
>> On Wed 2015-02-18 16:24:51 -0500, goupille wrote:
>>> iteration time: it is low for slow systems, and Tails is aimed to work
>>> on relatively slow systems it should be increased
>
Ticket:https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/8777
Update screenshots on the website if relevant
Branch:feature/8777-update-screenshots into devel
Milestone: 1.3
That one should be easy.
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https
Hi,
the AppArmor confinement of Tor Browser in Tails 1.3~rc1 breaks spell
checking. "Interesting", given that's supposed to have been checked
during the manual test suite.
Anyhow: now fixed, please review'n'merge :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev
intrigeri:
> sajolida wrote (18 Feb 2015 11:32:17 GMT) :
>> intrigeri:
>>> Alan wrote (12 Feb 2015 15:32:15 GMT) :
>> - Ability to close a circuit manually.
>
> No idea what are the use case for this feature that we would want to
> support. If someone really wants it, better add i
Simon Jacquin:
> I recently discovered your project, I am a french graphic designer, pretty
> much an outsider of the online underground culture.
> But I stongly understand how project like yours may be a ultra relevant
> fight in the future for our freedom.
Thanks for your interest in Tails.
> I
Hi,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (18 Feb 2015 23:50:20 GMT) :
> On Wed 2015-02-18 16:24:51 -0500, goupille wrote:
>> iteration time: it is low for slow systems, and Tails is aimed to work
>> on relatively slow systems it should be increased
> iteration time only has a cost during boot (persistence u
12 matches
Mail list logo
