[Tails-dev] Build failed in Jenkins: build_Tails_ISO_experimental #2244

See -- [...truncated 14896 lines...] Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/non-free i386 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/contrib Translation-en/DiffIndex Hit htt

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

On 05/04/2015 05:35 PM, intrigeri wrote: > I see two options from this point: > > A) Decide that the Atom feed is good enough and document it, with its >aforementioned limitation (so that people can adjust their config). >I volunteer to do that if we decide to go this way. > > B) Decide t

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

On 05/05/2015 08:42 PM, intrigeri wrote: > sajolida wrote (05 May 2015 13:45:39 GMT) : >> I'm not in favor of completely getting rid of them. I think that even if >> we use one of the solutions that you are proposing, we should still >> notify the list when we feel that more than two people should

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

sajolida wrote (05 May 2015 13:45:39 GMT) : > I'm not in favor of completely getting rid of them. I think that even if > we use one of the solutions that you are proposing, we should still > notify the list when we feel that more than two people should have a > look at a branch. > For example, whe

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4.1] feature/5623-Installer-should-refuse-empty-device

Hi, Ticket: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5623 Feature branch: https://git-tails.immerda.ch/kurono/liveusb-creator/log/?h=feature/5623-Installer-should-refuse-empty-device Could you please review and merge? Thanks, kurono ___ Tails-dev mailing

[Tails-dev] review and merge bugfix/9327-disable-starttls-warnings

Ticket: #9327 - Claws and Tor shouldn't warn on StartTLS connections to port 110 (POP3) and 143 (IMAP) Branch: bugfix/9327-disable-starttls-warnings into testing We've been carefully training our users to click through security warnings relayed from Tor by Vidalia when connecting to their

[Tails-dev] A suggestion regarding the kernel that Tails uses

The website of Tails claims that Tails is free software. But recently I've learned that it isn't quite so. Apparently Tails uses the version of Linux that contains proprietary binary blobs. In my opinion that is quite weird considering that the kernel that Debian GNU/Linux uses doesn't contain b

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

intrigeri: > some of us are tired of having to ask for review'n'merge on this list, > duplicating the (semantically more powerful) action of setting > a ticket as Ready for QA in Redmine. Recently, we tend to forget more > and more often to send such email; moreover, some teams (e.g. the doc > and

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

On 04/05/2015 17:35, intrigeri wrote: > Besides, I bet that some list subscribers would be glad if such > notifications were opt-in. Hello, I'm a lurker on this mailing list, therefore my opinion is barely important. I actually read 10% of such review'n'merge emails with interest. It's a good way

Re: [Tails-dev] #8999: Claws Mail leaks cleartext of encrypted email to the IMAP server [was: Re: PGP MIME is insecure (for me)]

sajolida: > During the last monthly meeting I volunteered to issue a security > advisory about the fact that Claws saved unencrypted emails to Drafts > and Queue folders on the IMAP server. > > I've been gathering info and doing shitloads of testing, and I think we > have (almost) all the informat

Re: [Tails-dev] Getting rid of review'n'merge email on this list

intrigeri: > Hi, > > some of us are tired of having to ask for review'n'merge on this list, > duplicating the (semantically more powerful) action of setting > a ticket as Ready for QA in Redmine. Recently, we tend to forget more > and more often to send such email; moreover, some teams (e.g. the d

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.4] feature/9340-Linux-from-Stretch

Hi, as explained on #9340, without this change, our build system will very soon start producing unbootable ISO images. Please merge into stable, testing, devel and feature/jessie. Filed #9341 for the next steps (once Linux 4.0 migrates to Debian testing). Cheers, -- intrigeri __