[Tails-dev] Tor Browser 5.5.1 is ready for testing

Hi, Tor Browser 5.5.1 is ready for testing and bundles can be found on: https://people.torproject.org/~gk/builds/5.5.1-build1/ This release mainly fixes regressions due to our switch to 5.5 that affected the usability of Tor Browser: font support got improved and Iframes using window.name are

Re: [Tails-dev] ebuild for tails-installer

Hi, (sorry I didn't read the entire thread; if there's anything not Gentoo-specific that I should be aware of, please point me to it explicitly) Austin English wrote (03 Feb 2016 04:30:12 GMT) : > It would be extremely helpful if source tarballs were available at Tails > upstream for each

Re: [Tails-dev] New User questions

dlcori...@lelantos.org: > Hello i will be soon new user of Tails. i hope its secure to use it. > > i have some questions . I replied to this on tails-support, but forgot to also include tails-dev for notification. Cheers! ___ Tails-dev mailing list

[Tails-dev] Fwd: [tor-dev] Git users, enable fsck by default!

Shall we do this too? Forwarded Message Subject: [tor-dev] Git users, enable fsck by default! From: Nick Mathewson To: tor-...@lists.torproject.org See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813157 for more information why. The tl;dr here is:

Re: [Tails-dev] Migrate Tail's browser AdBlock Plus to uBlock Origin

Hi, random_u...@airpost.net wrote (31 Jan 2016 20:11:50 GMT) : > What does seem quite clear to me, however (and has ever since I first > became aware of this matter) is that the best interests of at least an > overwhelming majority of Tor Browser and Tails users would best be > served by having

Re: [Tails-dev] Migrate Tail's browser AdBlock Plus to uBlock Origin

Hi, Nik Cubrilovic wrote (30 Jan 2016 06:26:44 GMT) : > Hi everybody - I know that the topic of migrating the Tor Browser on > Tails from AdBlock Plus (ABP) to a faster and more modern plugin comes > up regularly, so i'll keep this short and get to why Adblock Plus > should be replaced with

Re: [Tails-dev] (review) muri-doc/new-sigingin-key-fix-date

intrigeri: > sajolida wrote (02 Feb 2016 15:17:13 GMT) : >> I'm not super happy in principle to rewrite history like this (in this >> case something in /news) but here I think it's ok. > > Yes, especially since this specific piece of news is actually pointed > to from various places of our doc :)

Re: [Tails-dev] ebuild for tails-installer

On Feb 3, 2016 3:19 PM, "intrigeri" wrote: > > Hi, > > (sorry I didn't read the entire thread; if there's anything not > Gentoo-specific that I should be aware of, please point me to it > explicitly) No, Gentoo specific, ignore :). > Austin English wrote (03 Feb 2016

[Tails-dev] Notes of the contributor-meeting-20160203

attached the meeting-notes patch for the monthly meeting tonight. cheers, muri From 583c5a6bdff15c14b8e9b1ed0fbd567015359467 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muri Nicanor <m...@immerda.ch> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:15:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] added meeting notes 20160203 --- wiki/src/cont

[Tails-dev] ebuild for tails-installer

> Our upstream tarballs can be found there: > http://deb.tails.boum.org/pool/main/t/tails-installer/ > http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/tails-installer/ > > Cheers, > -- Great, I have updated the git repo with an ebuild for the last version. signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: [Tails-dev] Migrate Tail's browser AdBlock Plus to uBlock Origin

On 16-02-03 08:44 AM, intrigeri wrote: > How easy is it to turn off all filtering features / lists except > the ad blocking ones? From my understanding of how the Tor browser is laid out, it would be a matter of configuring uBlock Origin ("uBO") as wished, than simply shipping with the resulting

Re: [Tails-dev] Fwd: [tor-dev] Git users, enable fsck by default!

On 03/02/16 12:34, sajolida wrote: > > git config --add transfer.fsckobjects true That fixes it per-repository. To change your user defaults: git config --add --global transfer.fsckobjects true A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Tails-dev] Fwd: [tor-dev] Git users, enable fsck by default!

On Wed 2016-02-03 07:34:16 -0500, sajolida wrote: > Shall we do this too? Yes, anyone using git who cares about object integrity should probably set transfer.fsckobjects to true globally. Thanks for raising this here. hopefully we can get this to be the default upstream soon. --dkg