Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Hardware

2016-05-30 Thread flapflap
Hi, intrigeri: [snip] > Michael English wrote (16 Mar 2016 00:22:11 GMT) : [snip] > > This last sentence is only true in face of a very small class of > adversaries, given Tails threat model. Against a much bigger class of > adversaries, Tails is still very useful, even when run on > insecure

Re: [Tails-dev] intrigeri vs. Tails Redmine

2016-05-30 Thread Spencer
Hi, intrigeri: whenever you want me to read something or need my input, please assign the ticket to me and set "QA Check" to "Info Needed". Ack. Wordlife, Spencer ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org

Re: [Tails-dev] intrigeri vs. Tails Redmine

2016-05-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (14 Mar 2016 11:42:57 GMT) : > intrigeri wrote (04 Feb 2016 20:56:28 GMT) : >> tl;dr: in a couple months, I'll stop reading all changes made to our >> Redmine. Please start getting used to it now. >> I think it's time that I stop being notified of _every_ change made in >>

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Hardware

2016-05-30 Thread intrigeri
Hi, (the "starting a new thread on each follow-up" problem was addressed off-list; thank you, Michael! :) I'm glad I've asked the question of the target audience, since as we'll see below, it's a little bit tricky. Michael English wrote (16 Mar 2016 00:22:11 GMT) : > First, we should identify