Hi,
[ Ignoring some kind of private answer sent here although it doesn't
belong to this list. ]
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:32:17PM +0200, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:
> Is there any special reason why the partition where Tails installs itself is
> non-deterministic? It is thanks to differing
Hi,
drwhax:
sexual attention.
It is very hurtful to have my intentions decided for me ):
If the snip of code wasn't enough context: I am a fan of dd hacks (:
And as was said to emmapeel privately, love is for everybody XD
I love you, too.
Wordlife,
Spencer
> Hi,
>>//>>/Joanna Rutkowska: />>/dd if=/dev/sda1 | sha1sum />>//
> I love you XD
> Wordlife,
> Spencer
Spencer,
I'll do this publicly, this is against our code of conduct, see
https://tails.boum.org/contribute/working_together/code_of_conduct/
Please refrain from unwanted sexual attention.
Hi,
Joanna Rutkowska:
dd if=/dev/sda1 | sha1sum
I love you XD
Wordlife,
Spencer
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
Hello,
Is there any special reason why the partition where Tails installs itself is
non-deterministic? It is thanks to differing timestamps on the filesystem.
This posses a problem for a prudent user who would like to be able to verify
Tails integrity, e.g. by typing:
dd if=/dev/sda1 | sha1sum
Hello, all!
I'm writing to inform you that Tor 0.2.9.1-alpha now officially
exists. The source release has been uploaded to
https://dist.torproject.org/
; please remember to check the signatures.
I'll be updating the website and sending an official announcement in a
few minutes or hours, but as
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:41:37AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> bertagaz:
> > Since the 2.5 release, it seems one of our Torbirdy patches are fuzzy, which
> > makes the build of devel (and any branch based on it) fail.
>
> I suspect you mean "since torbirdy 0.2.0-1~bpo8+1 was accepted in
>
Hi again,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:44:27AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> u:
> > Question 1: how urgent is this?
>
> In general: keeping the Git tree building is high priority because
> otherwise any development based on the branch that fails to build
> is blocked.
>
> Right now: I don't know
