Intrigeri,
Hi,
s7r:
intrigeri wrote:
The text was copied from Electrum man page.
Thank you!
UTXO's are basically the coins you can spend. The spendable coins are in
UTXO's, not in addresses. Addresses are just a smart crypto way to let
the world know in advance who has the right to spend a
Hi,
s7r:
> intrigeri wrote:
> The text was copied from Electrum man page.
Thank you!
> UTXO's are basically the coins you can spend. The spendable coins are in
> UTXO's, not in addresses. Addresses are just a smart crypto way to let
> the world know in advance who has the right to spend a given
S7r,
Hello intrigeri, Michael,
intrigeri wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael English:
It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
outputs) bloat,
This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins that
Hello intrigeri, Michael,
intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael English:
>> It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
>> outputs) bloat,
>
> This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
> My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of
Hi Michael,
Michael English:
> It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
> outputs) bloat,
This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins that can be
spent to one single address, on the
>> Noticed one incompatibility.>>
>> https://github.com/HelloZeroNet/ZeroNet/issues/756
>>
>>
https://github.com/Whonix/control-port-filter-python/blob/master/usr/share/tor-controlport-filter/examples/40_zeronet.yml
anonym sorted that out by fixing a bug in ZeroNet.
On 1/10/17 5:27 AM, anonym wrote:
> Michael Carbone:
>> The move away from XUL could be an opportunity to address this by
>> building a more generic solution that could be used by the increasing
>> number of tor-powered applications/environments, such as onionshare,
>> ricochet, tails, qubes,
Mark Smith:
> On 1/10/17 5:18 AM, anonym wrote:
>> In Tails we run Tor Launcher as a stand-alone XUL application. Last I
>> checked it was not clear whether this would still be supported by
>> Firefox + WebExtensions. Do you know anything more about this?
>
> Unfortunately, I do not know anything
On 1/10/17 5:18 AM, anonym wrote:
> In Tails we run Tor Launcher as a stand-alone XUL application. Last I
> checked it was not clear whether this would still be supported by
> Firefox + WebExtensions. Do you know anything more about this?
Unfortunately, I do not know anything about Mozilla's
Hi,
I recommend the following change in the file ~/.electrum/config
{
"coin_chooser": "Privacy",
"proxy": "socks5:localhost:9050"
}
"Attempts to better preserve user privacy. First, if any coin is spent
from a user address, all coins are. Compared to spending from other
addresses
anonym:
> Patrick Schleizer:
>> [override] will probably work for Whonix. Joy and me drafted a
>> plan.
>>
>> In one sentence: We at Whonix invent a new a separate config
>> folder, parse it with a yml merger python script, and generate
>> another yml file that gets passed to
emma peel:
> here the notes for the monthly meeting, sorry for the delay!
merged, thanks!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
12 matches
Mail list logo
