On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Austin English wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2015 4:50 AM, "intrigeri" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Austin English wrote (07 Sep 2015 20:30:59 GMT) :
>> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Austin English
>> >
Hi,
Austin English wrote (07 Sep 2015 20:30:59 GMT) :
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Austin English
> wrote:
>> Rebasing it was trivial (the conflict was on adding the test to the
>> Makefile). It looks like upstream has a bug (they don't actually run
>> the tests),
On Oct 2, 2015 4:50 AM, "intrigeri" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Austin English wrote (07 Sep 2015 20:30:59 GMT) :
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Austin English
wrote:
> >> Rebasing it was trivial (the conflict was on adding the test to the
> >> Makefile).
On Sep 1, 2015 12:17 PM, "Austin English" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Austin English wrote (31 Aug 2015 19:48:50 GMT) :
> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 5:03 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> >>>
pretty-in-p...@safe-mail.net wrote (13 Aug 2015 16:02:50 GMT) :
Can you please follow this thread and update Wget for the next version of
Tails?
Topic: [Bug-wget] FTP PORT command code in v1.16.3?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-08/msg00020.html
I haven't performed any
Can you please follow this thread and update Wget for the next version of Tails?
Topic: [Bug-wget] FTP PORT command code in v1.16.3?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-08/msg00020.html
I haven't performed any sniffing attempts on my network, but apparently others
have on theirs.