So, to clarify: now that u. has validated that this branch reaches its
goal, it still needs to be reviewed and merged for 1.5. Any taker?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To
u wrote (16 Jun 2015 12:28:36 GMT) :
I simply modified line 1008 in
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/liveusb/creator.py (derived from the
feature_jessie branch) using syslinux-amd64 and the latest
experimental ISO and it works! Yay \o/
Cool, thanks! In what environment, exactly? (Jessie? sid?
intrigeri:
u wrote (16 Jun 2015 12:28:36 GMT) :
I simply modified line 1008 in
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/liveusb/creator.py (derived from the
feature_jessie branch) using syslinux-amd64 and the latest
experimental ISO and it works! Yay \o/
Cool, thanks! In what environment, exactly?
Hey,
u.: it would be awesome if you quickly (and possibly hackishly)
patched Tails Installer to make it use utils/linux/syslinux-amd64
instead of utils/linux/syslinux, and tested that on an amd64 Jessie or
sid system. I'm not sure if that filename will work, for example (it
might be that
Hi,
as you may know already, Tails Installer uses the syslinux binary
shipped in our ISO, so that the version of the syslinux modules we
install match the version of the syslinux binary being used.
Given this, once Tails Installer is in Debian/Ubuntu, we'll need to
have an amd64 syslinux binary
