Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-27 Thread anonym
27/05/14 09:08, intrigeri wrote: > anonym wrote (26 May 2014 18:14:27 GMT) : >> I pinged the ticket and now Mike Perry seems to want to revert those >> prefs [1] although the follow-ups makes it look like it's not decided yet. > > ... so it seems unclear what we should do for RC1. > > My take on

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-27 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (26 May 2014 18:14:27 GMT) : > I pinged the ticket and now Mike Perry seems to want to revert those > prefs [1] although the follow-ups makes it look like it's not decided yet. ... so it seems unclear what we should do for RC1. My take on it: let's just keep the current state we have

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-26 Thread anonym
26/05/14 11:19, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > intrigeri wrote (12 May 2014 14:45:05 GMT) : >> I'll let you follow-up with the Tor ticket, and nag the TBB team >> if needed. > > I'm curious (and would like our browser in 1.1~rc1 to be as close as > possible to the one we'll ship in the final 1.1): an

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (12 May 2014 14:45:05 GMT) : > I'll let you follow-up with the Tor ticket, and nag the TBB team > if needed. I'm curious (and would like our browser in 1.1~rc1 to be as close as possible to the one we'll ship in the final 1.1): any news on this front? Cheers, -- intrigeri

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-12 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (12 May 2014 10:32:08 GMT) : > GeKo says that "there are no plans to revert these yet". So, I'm going > to review feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1 and merge it as-is, > ignoring this topic for now. Merged, thanks! I'll let you follow-up with the Tor ticket, and nag the TBB te

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-12 Thread intrigeri
intrigeri wrote (09 May 2014 16:31:29 GMT) : > Fine with me, if the user feedback for TBB 3.6.x has not exposed > serious issues on this front. I've seen at least one ticket in passing > that did not look good. Maybe ask the TBB and Tor QA people? I went ahead and asked the TBB support folks. I'm

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-09 Thread intrigeri
anonym wrote (09 May 2014 16:09:40 GMT) : >> If these changes are now good enough for Tails 1.1, all right, I'm >> happy, but then you'll want to update #7127 :) > Perhaps we can just forget about that ticket and close it as the TBB > people apparently thought it ok to ship those changes in the no

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-09 Thread anonym
09/05/14 17:49, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (09 May 2014 15:02:02 GMT) : >> Please review and merge (both Git and APT suite wise) into devel. > > I'll do this by the end of the week, once I get the clarification I'm > asking below. Please file a ticket to ensure it's not forgotten. >

Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-09 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (09 May 2014 15:02:02 GMT) : > Please review and merge (both Git and APT suite wise) into devel. I'll do this by the end of the week, once I get the clarification I'm asking below. Please file a ticket to ensure it's not forgotten. Before I start diving into it, I would not mind

[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge] feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1

2014-05-09 Thread anonym
Hi, Branch:feature/torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1+tails1 APT suite: feature-torbrowser-24.5.0esr-1-tails1 Ticket:No Please review and merge (both Git and APT suite wise) into devel. I'ts already been merged into experimental. I've run features/torified_browsing.feature in the automated test suit