On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:53:49PM +0100, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:52:20AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > intrigeri wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:26:11 GMT) :
> > >> I patched it so it needs another review before merging. Sorry...
> >
> > > I'll take care o
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:52:20AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:26:11 GMT) :
> >> I patched it so it needs another review before merging. Sorry...
>
> > I'll take care of it. Updated the ticket.
>
> Done and merged.
>
> Now, what about the test/dont_autostar
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:26:11 GMT) :
>> I patched it so it needs another review before merging. Sorry...
> I'll take care of it. Updated the ticket.
Done and merged.
Now, what about the test/dont_autostart_iceweasel branch?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.pti
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (09 Jan 2014 10:14:01 GMT) :
> I tested that between yesterday and this morning. I'm glad I lunched out
> yesterday because this morning I discovered a new bug. The "Tor is
> ready" message was appearing too early, when Iceweasel would still tell
> you that "Tor is not r
intrigeri:
> Anyway, I think I've managed to make it good enough to release, and
> sajolida agreed to take care of the review'n'merge. I guess he
> wouldn't mind someone else (bertagaz, hint, hint :) to have a look at
> the branch that updates the test suite.
I tested that between yesterday and th
Hi,
as discussed on the incremental upgrades thread, we've decided that
#5735 (Do not start the browser automatically) is blocking the
activation of incremental upgrades by default, so I've settled to
complete this branch. It was "a little" more complicated than
I expected when I committed to do t
