Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-08 Thread intrigeri
sajol...@pimienta.org wrote (07 Oct 2012 08:51:24 GMT) : Great! I fixed the language a bit with commit 4e08074. I fixed some grammar and merged again into devel. Will push soon. (I think such doc / style / grammar fixes, for already-merged branches, could be done directly in devel.)

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-07 Thread sajolida
On 02/10/12 15:14, anonym wrote: 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't modified (i.e. it's

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread Ague Mill
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:21:05PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature (i.e.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread bertagaz
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:33:18PM +, Ague Mill wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:21:05PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: intrigeri wrote (03 Oct 2012 17:30:10 GMT) : anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to me, although

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-04 Thread intrigeri
Don't wait for me, I am convinced as well. Same here :) Merged. Adapted the network connections preset's name in the bundled doc. ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread anonym
02/10/12 16:09, intrigeri wrote: Hi, anonym wrote (02 Oct 2012 13:14:58 GMT) : 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup,

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:53 GMT) : Or can the rephrasing just live in git and be released as t-p-s 0.19 during the Tails 0.14 freeze when the translations has been done? I'm fine with that. Will you take care of make this happen? Also, any thoughts about how we'll handle the

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-03 Thread intrigeri
hi, anonym wrote (03 Oct 2012 14:34:59 GMT) : So, with the current state of things it still looks like a bug to me, although with nice side-effects. Making it into a proper feature (i.e. patching nm-applet) is definitely desirable, but not something I'm willing to take on for the 0.14

[Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread anonym
30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: Hi, please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't modified (i.e. it's still at commit 0bc2057). How can I

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread Ague Mill
Since live-persist is the glue that fixes all the quirks we have with live-boot's vanilla persistence, this seems like a perfect fit. This is done in commits 77c3261 and 4db38e9. Looks nicer this way. The function `fix_gconf_dirs` might benefit from some more quoting of the variables.

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, anonym wrote (02 Oct 2012 13:14:58 GMT) : 30/09/12 21:01, intrigeri wrote: please, anyone who did the 0.18 release of tails-persistence-setup, push your pristine-tar branch. I followed the instructions in contribute/release_process/persistence-setup, and that branch wasn't modified

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Ague Mill wrote (02 Oct 2012 14:08:05 GMT) : * Connect automatically checkbox gets unchecked on each boot: IMHO this bug is good :). Hence we can ignore this for now and just mention it as a known issue (commit 0f7f652). We have to rule this as either a bug or a feature. In my views,

Re: [Tails-dev] Please review and merge feature/persistent_NM_connections [was: tails-persistence-setup releases vs. Tails 0.14]

2012-10-02 Thread alan
From: anonym ano...@lavabit.com Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 15:14:58 +0200 [...] If the rest of you agree that all is good now, please review and merge this branch into devel so it can be included in Tails 0.14. Please merge the new state of this branch to experimental. And, by the way, is