Hi,
Griffin Boyce wrote (11 Mar 2014 19:07:27 GMT) :
> While I can't promise anything, replacing the current (non-working)
> solution for hash-checking seems promising.
Sounds good, thanks!
> This would probably just be a patch. If any code results, where
> should it go? Attached to the issue
Heya,
While I can't promise anything, replacing the current (non-working)
solution for hash-checking seems promising. This would probably just be
a patch. If any code results, where should it go? Attached to the
issue in question?
~Griffin
(aka monchichi on #tor-dev)
