Hi,
Michael English:
>> Still, this doesn't answer my question of why the setting called
>> 'privacy' "helps to reduce blockchain UTXO". I would love to
>> understand, if someone is kind enough to explain it to me.
> I will try to explain to you what I think Electrum meant by reducing UTXO
> blo
anonym:
> I just spent an hour reading: […]
Thanks for diving into it.
> First, let me say that I absolutely do not want this feature documented for
> end-users. I'm not sure how this could be explained in less a way so a user
> could
> make an informed decision without using thousands of words
I just spent an hour reading:
*
https://medium.com/@lopp/the-challenges-of-optimizing-unspent-output-selection-a3e5d05d13ef#.63vst18ff
* https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/1203
First, let me say that I absolutely do not want this feature documented for
end-users. I'm not sure how this
Michael English:
> Anonym,
>
>> Of course, mine too (and intrigeri's, I'm sure :)). Sorry for
>> frustrating you like this about something that is obvious for you,
>> but it indeed gets hard for us when we need to consider things we
>> have little or no clue about. And I'm sure you understand we c
Anonym,
Of course, mine too (and intrigeri's, I'm sure :)). Sorry for frustrating you
like this about something that is obvious for you, but it indeed gets hard for
us when we need to consider things we have little or no clue about. And I'm
sure you understand we cannot just blindly trust and
Michael English:
> Anonym,
>
> Please Cc me with any replies. For some reason, I am unable to subscribe to
> the list.
Got it!
> Anonym:
>> Note that I haven't chimed in with my opinion yet. :) I think intrigeri
>> is just careful: privacy features are routinely exaggerated in their
>> efficacy
Anonym,
Please Cc me with any replies. For some reason, I am unable to subscribe
to the list.
Anonym:
> Note that I haven't chimed in with my opinion yet. :) I think intrigeri
> is just careful: privacy features are routinely exaggerated in their
> efficacy and can easily have many unexpected
Michael English:
>> Anyway: I personally don't feel responsible for maintaining the
>> Electrum integration in Tails, would rather not to become more
>> involved into it, and will therefore let its maintainer (i.e. anonym)
>> make the call. But I'm genuinely curious about the unspent outputs
>> opt
Intrigeri,
Hi,
s7r:
intrigeri wrote:
The text was copied from Electrum man page.
Thank you!
UTXO's are basically the coins you can spend. The spendable coins are in
UTXO's, not in addresses. Addresses are just a smart crypto way to let
the world know in advance who has the right to spend a
Hi,
s7r:
> intrigeri wrote:
> The text was copied from Electrum man page.
Thank you!
> UTXO's are basically the coins you can spend. The spendable coins are in
> UTXO's, not in addresses. Addresses are just a smart crypto way to let
> the world know in advance who has the right to spend a given
Intrigeri,
Hi Michael,
Michael English:
It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
outputs) bloat,
This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins that can be
spent to one single address, on th
S7r,
Hello intrigeri, Michael,
intrigeri wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael English:
It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
outputs) bloat,
This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins that can
Hello intrigeri, Michael,
intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael English:
>> It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
>> outputs) bloat,
>
> This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
> My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins
Hi Michael,
Michael English:
> It also helps to reduce blockchain UTXO (unspent transaction
> outputs) bloat,
This makes me curious. How does this help with that property, exactly?
My intuition tells me that by restricting the set of coins that can be
spent to one single address, on the contrary,
Hi,
I recommend the following change in the file ~/.electrum/config
{
"coin_chooser": "Privacy",
"proxy": "socks5:localhost:9050"
}
"Attempts to better preserve user privacy. First, if any coin is spent
from a user address, all coins are. Compared to spending from other
addresses to
15 matches
Mail list logo
