Re: [Tails-dev] Spring cleaning our GitLab labels

2022-03-16 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri (2022-02-22): > 1. Delete these labels > >- Camouflage: no open issues, probably never coming back >- I2P: no open issues, probably never coming back >- Handbook: only 2 open issues, can be tracked just fine with other > labels >- Feed Reader: no open issues;

Re: [Tails-dev] Spring cleaning our GitLab labels

2022-02-23 Thread sajolida
intrigeri: > 2. Merge these labels: > >- "C: Installation", "C: Installation Assistant", "C: Installer" > → "C: Installation" I also thought about that this other day. So, yes! -- sajolida Tails — https://tails.boum.org/ UX · Fundraising · Technical Writing OpenPGP_signature

Re: [Tails-dev] Spring cleaning our GitLab labels

2022-02-22 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Zen Fu (2022-02-22): > I'm not sure how important such historical metadata is, though, so maybe > it's not a problem. For the labels I proposed to delete, IMO historical metadata will probably never be useful again. But if affected people have doubts about this for some of these labels, then

Re: [Tails-dev] Spring cleaning our GitLab labels

2022-02-22 Thread Zen Fu
Hi, the only concern that comes to my mind is loss of historical metadata. "If you delete a label, it is permanently deleted. All references to the label are removed from the system and you cannot undo the deletion." [1] I'm not sure how important such historical metadata is, though,

[Tails-dev] Spring cleaning our GitLab labels

2022-02-22 Thread intrigeri
Hi, We've been using GitLab since a while and I think it's a good time to make our set of labels a bit leaner and easier to use. I want to focus on low hanging fruits here. I don't think it's a good time to take a step down and do a full revamp of our labels. I propose we: 1. Delete these