Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2012-01-04 Thread intrigeri
sajolida wrote (03 Jan 2012 20:41:00 GMT) : > No news. So would this patch do the trick? I had prepared something similar. Applied a mix between yours and mine. Thanks! Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https:/

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2012-01-03 Thread sajolida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 intrigeri: > Hi, > > sajolida wrote (02 Jan 2012 16:20:19 GMT) : >> 1. Using SSH > >> We should exclude local IPs from the torifying SSH configuration in >> /etc/ssh/ssh_config. See the patch in attachment. > > Good idea. However, the proposed pat

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2012-01-02 Thread intrigeri
Hi, sajolida wrote (02 Jan 2012 16:20:19 GMT) : > 1. Using SSH > We should exclude local IPs from the torifying SSH configuration in > /etc/ssh/ssh_config. See the patch in attachment. Good idea. However, the proposed patch also disables, for connections to RFC1918 IPs, all kinds of protections

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2012-01-02 Thread sajolida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 intrigeri: > Hi, > > Tails 0.10-rc1 was tagged in Git, built and pushed to our mirrors: > > http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/testing/tails-i386-0.10-rc1/ > > It wants to be tested, tested, and tested again. Enjoy! > > As usual with Tails RCs,

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2011-12-30 Thread anonym
12/30/2011 11:02 PM, sajolida: > anonym: >> 12/26/2011 11:46 PM, intrigeri: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Tails 0.10-rc1 was tagged in Git, built and pushed to our mirrors: >>> >>> http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/testing/tails-i386-0.10-rc1/ >>> >>> It wants to be tested, tested, and tested again. Enjoy! >>

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2011-12-30 Thread sajolida
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 anonym: > 12/26/2011 11:46 PM, intrigeri: >> Hi, >> >> Tails 0.10-rc1 was tagged in Git, built and pushed to our mirrors: >> >> http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/testing/tails-i386-0.10-rc1/ >> >> It wants to be tested, tested, and tested again. E

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2011-12-30 Thread anonym
12/26/2011 11:46 PM, intrigeri: > Hi, > > Tails 0.10-rc1 was tagged in Git, built and pushed to our mirrors: > > http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/testing/tails-i386-0.10-rc1/ > > It wants to be tested, tested, and tested again. Enjoy! > > As usual with Tails RCs, assume it's not been throug

[Tails-dev] Tails 0.10-rc1 wants to be tested

2011-12-26 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Tails 0.10-rc1 was tagged in Git, built and pushed to our mirrors: http://dl.amnesia.boum.org/tails/testing/tails-i386-0.10-rc1/ It wants to be tested, tested, and tested again. Enjoy! As usual with Tails RCs, assume it's not been through our test suite, your mileage may vary, no warran