Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-20 Thread sajolida
Giorgio Maone: On 15/05/2015 18:14, sajolida wrote: So we could instead embed the minimum version of the extension required (maybe div id=extension-version1.0/div or something like this). Then the extension would know if it's outdated, even if the HTML code of the page didn't change

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-15 Thread sajolida
Giorgio Maone: On 12/05/2015 18:54, sajolida wrote: B. It's not the latest version of the extension. This version is incompatible with the version of the page. We can't go forward or otherwise stuff won't work: - How can we detect that? Through a version number in the URL as you are

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-13 Thread Giorgio Maone
On 12/05/2015 18:54, sajolida wrote: B. It's not the latest version of the extension. This version is incompatible with the version of the page. We can't go forward or otherwise stuff won't work: - How can we detect that? Through a version number in the URL as you are proposing? Wouldn't

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-12 Thread sajolida
Oops, I didn't meant to answer this in private. Answering back to the list... Giorgio Maone: On 07/05/2015 18:12, sajolida wrote: Hi Giorgio, A few days ago we finished a wireframe of the extension that we believe is a good start for you to work on. It might still change slightly as we

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-12 Thread sajolida
intrigeri: sajolida wrote (07 May 2015 16:12:52 GMT) : The v1 part of the URL corresponds to the version of the extension. I would suggest giving its own versioning to the URL scheme used by the extension, instead of re-using the extension's versioning. Otherwise, we'll have to maintain

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-09 Thread Giorgio Maone
On 07/05/2015 18:12, sajolida wrote: Hi Giorgio, A few days ago we finished a wireframe of the extension that we believe is a good start for you to work on. It might still change slightly as we continue discussing small details of it. See

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-09 Thread intrigeri
Hi Giorgio, Giorgio Maone wrote (08 May 2015 21:29:44 GMT) : May I just ask, though, why YAML and not, for instance, JSON? We already have quite some code to generate, update and validate YAML documents with a very similar purpose and content. Sticking to YAML would allow us to re-use some of

Re: [Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-07 Thread intrigeri
Hi, sajolida wrote (07 May 2015 16:12:52 GMT) : We also updated the blueprint with some more implementation information. https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/bootstrapping/extension/ Impressive. I took a look and pushed a few nitpicking changes. A few comments and suggestions follow: The v1

[Tails-dev] extension specification

2015-05-07 Thread sajolida
Hi Giorgio, A few days ago we finished a wireframe of the extension that we believe is a good start for you to work on. It might still change slightly as we continue discussing small details of it. See https://labs.riseup.net/code/attachments/download/759/extension-20150430.fodg. We also