Re: [Tails-dev] GNOME menu items

Hi, sajolida: > u: >> spriver: >>> sajolida: >> and do we want to change this? >> In this particular case I think this should be proposed and changed upstream. It's a cool dude :) >>> >>> so maybe we should open a ticket to address this topic? (especially for >>> finding the

[Tails-dev] Browser Bookmarks Persistence Bug

When saving bookmarks to the “Unsorted bookmarks” category, occasionally a bookmark moves from “Unsorted bookmarks” to “Bookmarks menu” when I reboot. I think that this has been a bug in Tails for a long time and I can reproduce the problem on a consistent basis.

Re: [Tails-dev] Tails Hardware

Sorry, I just noticed that the link to installing Libreboot on the X200 is incorrect. Here is the correct link: https://libreboot.org/docs/install/x200_external.html . Michael English: > Intrigeri, > > First, we should identify the problem. Tails does not replace all of the > software on one's

Re: [Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

freedom-m...@sigaint.org: > There is any chance of Tails OS see other version that looks like the 1.6? > The 2.2 version is UGLY AS HELL. I agree :) We switched to GNOME Shell in Classic mode (with the grey menus) because we wanted to continue providing the top-left Applications and Places menus

Re: [Tails-dev] logancij / press page

Muri Nicanor: > attached a patch that adds the logancij to the press page Thanks for thinking about that. I moved your snippet to the "Conference" section and duplicated it in the monthly report for March. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org

Re: [Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

On Thu 2016-03-17 14:59:15 -0400, intrigeri wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote (17 Mar 2016 16:20:31 GMT) : >> It's also possible that some default GNOME shell stuff requires fancier >> graphics capabilities than some hardware provides. i believe gnome >> classic doesn't have as many requirements

[Tails-dev] IFF session about connecting to Tor in Tails

Hi everybody, [Putting tails-dev in copy once so they know this info is available.] So we had a session at the IFF about the UX of connecting to Tor in Tails. Despite being scheduled on the last day of the festival, many people attended: Tails contributors, Tor developers, UX experts, people

Re: [Tails-dev] [RFC] Design of our freezable APT repository

intrigeri: > Hi, > > anonym wrote (10 Mar 2016 20:06:31 GMT) : >>> Upgrading to a new snapshot > >> I expect it to be quite rare that we need to encode a particular >> snapshot in a topic branch, which is both good and bad. Good, because we >> then do not have to deal with the problems it may

[Tails-dev] (review)[de] Shutdown notification; question to .desktop files

Hi, (posted on Tails dev since this concerns the .iso's itself and my question concerns the dev's). I've added a translation in German of the shutdown message regarding the wiping of the memory. I also built the image with the applied changes, everything went fine and while shutting down the

Re: [Tails-dev] Proposal for Anti-Keystroke Fingerprinting Tool

ban...@openmailbox.org: > == Attack Description == > > Keystroke fingerprinting works by measuring how long keys are pressed > and the time between presses. Its very high accuracy poses a serious > threat to anonymous users.[1] A while ago, I asked about that on tor-talk:

Re: [Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

anonym: > sajolida: >> freedom-m...@sigaint.org: >>> There is any chance of Tails OS see other version that looks like the 1.6? >>> The 2.2 version is UGLY AS HELL. >> >> I agree :) >> >> We switched to GNOME Shell in Classic mode (with the grey menus) because >> we wanted to continue providing

[Tails-dev] [review] Updates in learn.mdwn, faq.mdwn and press appearances

Hi, please review in elouann/documentation the following commits: 91399b4 - add press appearances 0da8f9e - Update on learn.mdwn / Access Now 8561895 - Tails is now based on Jessie Thank you, cheers signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

Fred Schiff: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:36 AM, sajolida wrote: >> freedom-m...@sigaint.org: >>> There is any chance of Tails OS see other version that looks like the >>> 1.6? >>> The 2.2 version is UGLY AS HELL. >> >> I agree :) >> >> We switched to GNOME Shell in Classic

[Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

There is any chance of Tails OS see other version that looks like the 1.6? The 2.2 version is UGLY AS HELL. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to

Re: [Tails-dev] GNOME menu items

u: > spriver: >> sajolida: > and do we want to change this? > >>> In this particular case I think this should be proposed and changed >>> upstream. It's a cool dude :) >> >> so maybe we should open a ticket to address this topic? (especially for >> finding the appropriate section(s)). I can

Re: [Tails-dev] Porting Tails to Debian Stretch

intrigeri: > sajolida wrote (09 Mar 2016 12:19:48 GMT) : >>> We are in particular looking for one person to be >>> responsible for the documentation-side of things, since we feel >>> keeping it sort-of up-to-date will help us identify regressions >>> early. > >> I can be this person. > >

[Tails-dev] Feature 11198 - shell scripts to python

Hello, I would like to work on migrating the shell scripts to python and I would like your input on how to best proceed. Since there are quite a bunch of shell scrips to convert, I would like to avoid working on the same things as someone else so we don't step on each other's toes. I know

Re: [Tails-dev] [Secure Desktops] Proposal for Anti-Keystroke Fingerprinting Tool

Hello. Mouse Fingerprinting, Keyboard Fingerprinting, Device Fingerprinting (Active collection modes, using hidden channel in the legit TCP/IP trafic going through TOR) are specialities that have NO SOLUTION with "software only » approaches. These problems cannot be solved by software only. The

Re: [Tails-dev] Tail 2.2 Ugly as HELL

what these extensions? On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:36 AM, sajolida wrote: > freedom-m...@sigaint.org: > > There is any chance of Tails OS see other version that looks like the > 1.6? > > The 2.2 version is UGLY AS HELL. > > I agree :) > > We switched to GNOME Shell in

Re: [Tails-dev] GNOME menu items

spriver: > Hi, > > sajolida: >>> and do we want to change this? >> In this particular case I think this should be proposed and changed >> upstream. It's a cool dude :) > > so maybe we should open a ticket to address this topic? (especially for > finding the appropriate section(s)). I can

[Tails-dev] Proposal for Anti-Keystroke Fingerprinting Tool

== Attack Description == Keystroke fingerprinting works by measuring how long keys are pressed and the time between presses. Its very high accuracy poses a serious threat to anonymous users.[1] This tracking technology has been deployed by major advertisers (Google, Facebook), banks and

[Tails-dev] logancij / press page

attached a patch that adds the logancij to the press page cheers, -- muri From 6f0d0ae12e28fc18713c4de0a5b76bb70707461e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Muri Nicanor Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:39:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] added the logan cij talk and the recording to the press

Re: [Tails-dev] Browser Bookmarks Persistence Bug

Michael English: > When saving bookmarks to the “Unsorted bookmarks” category, occasionally > a bookmark moves from “Unsorted bookmarks” to “Bookmarks menu” when I > reboot. I think that this has been a bug in Tails for a long time and I > can reproduce the problem on a consistent basis. created