[Tails-dev] [Tails - Feature #5991] Include BitTorrent software
Hi, sajolida: It's great if you want to work on this yourself ... send me all this information and I'll help you structure the documentation. Word. You're the best! Though I might not get around to this for a week or two, or three :) Wordlife, Spencer ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] firefox -allow-remote (what does it do?)
Hi, Anonymous: what is the "-allow-remote" value mean? "In the TBB 4.5 they removed support for passing -allow-remote in anyway." why in Tails 1.7 does it remain and what exactly does it do? Any luck? the few websites where it's mentioned do not do a good job of explaining this... If you find a place documenting this or other relevant packages, scripts, and so on, please share. Wordlife, Spencer ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Upgrade Tails Bitcoin donation address
Michael English: > Electrum version 2.0 and higher supports the creation of > multi-signature wallet types. I recommend that Tails upgrade their > Bitcoin donation address to a multi-signature address for increased > security and redundancy. A multi-signature address requires m of n > signatures from separate wallets in order to spend the corresponding > Bitcoins. A partially signed transaction is created and sent to one of > the cosigners for completion. You can setup a 2 of 3 multi-signature > wallet to protect against one of the cosigners' wallets being lost or > destroyed. In order to set it up, you need the master public keys of > the cosigners' wallets. The cosigners are usually other leaders of the > project or it can be an offline wallet. The resulting multi-signature > addresses begin with a 3 instead of a 1. > > Please read the Electrum documentation on multisig at > http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/multisig.html . If you have any > further questions, email me. Hi Michael, Thanks for the info. I'm forwarding this to our accounting team who's managing our Bitcoin wallet. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Release versioning
intrigeri: > apparently you are willing to understand better how this works > (otherwise you would not have bothered writing the message I'm > replying to), so here we go: > > sajolida wrote (01 Dec 2015 12:44:46 GMT) : >> I don't know what this UDF is used for as 1.9 will never exist, but >> maybe we should rename it into >> upgrade/v1/Tails/2.0/i386/alpha/upgrades.yml > > Until we merge feature/jessie into devel, all builds from the devel > branch believe that next major release is 1.9, and then running the > test suite on ISOs built from devel still need that UDF. > > Note in passing: we cannot simply *rename* a UDF this way: its content > matters more than the URL, and is authenticated. > >> or create another one for 2.0. > > We always need a UDF for release N+1 immediately after N has been > released (in this case, N=1.8 and N+1=2.0), for the reason > I explained above. > > The good news is that our release process guarantees this invariant, > and I don't think the current situation adds any specific requirement > of its own. > > => I still don't think there's anything to update :) Cool, thanks for all the info. I was also thinking this must be for the test suite or something not user-visible... ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Release versioning
intrigeri: > sajolida wrote (30 Nov 2015 16:39:04 GMT) : >> Sure, I didn't think about that. So I updated: > >> - master (841af4e) > > Reviewed, OK! > >> - internal (90ad3ac) This one was actually in summit-2015, but pushed already :) >> - accounting (8750ec7) > > Please push these so I can review them :) Done now, sorry... ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Release versioning
sajolida wrote (02 Dec 2015 09:40:18 GMT) : > intrigeri: >> sajolida wrote (30 Nov 2015 16:39:04 GMT) : >>> - internal (90ad3ac) > This one was actually in summit-2015, but pushed already :) Good! >>> - accounting (8750ec7) All right! Cheers! -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
