Patrick Schleizer wrote (25 Feb 2016 23:00:22 GMT) :
> As agreed back then.
Thanks!
___
Tails-dev mailing list
Tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to
intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> I've just stumbled upon an issue [1] open by Jake on Subgraph OS bug
> tracker, about this topic, so I thought I would close this thread
> that's still lying in my inbox, and sum up the process that lead us to
> a (not implemented) conclusion.
>
> Last time we discussed it
Tobias Frei wrote:
I wonder if the idea of using a random username has a serious problem:
It makes every [Tails / anonymity distribution] session uniquely
identifiable if the username gets sent in any way. And we *do* assume
that it gets sent, because that's basically the idea behind the
Hi!
sajol...@pimienta.org:
Note that in the case of Tails, we recommend our users against doing
this. Which is mix different identities in a same working session:
https://tails.boum.org/doc/about/warning/#index8h1
Whonix has a similar warning:
Hi,
[dropping Patrick from Cc, as he obviously reads tails-dev@.]
Patrick Schleizer wrote (15 Aug 2014 21:17:17 GMT) :
Let's think again of examples where this might happen. And then
determine with which strategy users would be better off in
which case.
I think it's a useful approach.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I wonder if the idea of using a random username has a serious problem:
It makes every [Tails / anonymity distribution] session uniquely
identifiable if the username gets sent in any way. And we *do* assume
that it gets sent, because that's
Hi!
intrigeri:
I'm coming back on the shared username/hostname thing, that was
rediscussed a bit lately, with input from Freepto and pointers to
Subgraph OS code, on a Tails ticket:
https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5655
As you can see in my comment #6 there, it's unclear to me
