Zen Fu:
> intrigeri writes:
>> sajolida (2021-11-24):
>>> My opinion is "no", in favor of #7148 but I'd like to hear more from the
>>> rest of the team.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> +1, I think that:
>
> - sajolida's analysis makes sense, and
>
> - trying to reach a cheaper, maybe less convincing, but
intrigeri writes:
> sajolida (2021-11-24):
>> My opinion is "no", in favor of #7148 but I'd like to hear more from the
>> rest of the team.
>
> I agree.
+1, I think that:
- sajolida's analysis makes sense, and
- trying to reach a cheaper, maybe less convincing, but on the other
hand more
Hi,
sajolida (2021-11-24):
> My opinion is "no", in favor of #7148 but I'd like to hear more from the
> rest of the team.
I agree.
Note that #7148 is a GNOME preference (dconf/gsettings),
so either we implement it in an ad-hoc way, or we implement
the more general
CyberPunk.Neural.Interface via Tails-dev:
> Looking to help with windows camouflage feature. what GTK version the
> latest TAILS build is using or plan on using?
For the record, the Windows camouflage was dropped from Tails 2.0
(January 2016) because it was not ported to GNOME 3.14:
Looking to help with windows camouflage feature. what GTK version the latest
TAILS build is using or plan on using?
Thanks.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
publickey - CyberPunk.Neural.Interface@protonmail.com - 0x1FDCABD9.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description:
