Re: [Tails-project] Call for feedback: proof-of-concept of our issues in GitLab

2019-12-03 Thread sajolida
Wow, it super cool to see that you already have an automated import process :) Things I could spot within 20 minutes of browsing through it: - Redmine issues are sometimes referenced with '#' and sometimes without. For example: https://0xacab.org/intrigeri/redmine-import-1/issues/17227

Re: [Tails-project] #8948: Reconsider the terminology around "persistence"

2019-12-03 Thread numbat
On 03/12/2019 15:13, u wrote: > Hi! Hello! > On 30.11.19 12:30, sajolida wrote: >> u: > >> I think that each translation team should maintain a translation >> glossary for all these more technical terms. This is not specific to the >> terminology around Persistence and the same applies to MAC

Re: [Tails-project] #8948: Reconsider the terminology around "persistence"

2019-12-03 Thread u
Hi! On 30.11.19 12:30, sajolida wrote: > u: > I think that each translation team should maintain a translation > glossary for all these more technical terms. This is not specific to the > terminology around Persistence and the same applies to MAC spoofing, Tor > bridges, proxy, privacy, cookies,

Re: [Tails-project] Call for feedback: proof-of-concept of our issues in GitLab

2019-12-03 Thread segfault
Hi, intrigeri: >>> Known problems that we *might* be able to solve later >>> = >>> >>> - All issues appear to have been created by the user account that did >>> the migration. We could fix that if we're migrating to a GitLab >>> instance on

Re: [Tails-project] Blog post: "Celebrating 10 years of Tails!"

2019-12-03 Thread anonym
I love it! Great job! Here are my remarks/suggestions/~corrections: > +Since then we released 98 versions of Tails, which were used more than We just released Tails 4.1, so this number might need to be incremented. > + [...] Incognito [...]> + was the first live operating system to include a