On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 09:02:24PM -0400, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
> True enough.
> But with Redhat voting with their feet it will make the uptake of BTRFS much
> slower if at all.
I am not sure btrfs is quite ready for production use yet, so not sure
why redhat ever supported doing so in the
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 10:18:19PM -0400, Stewart C. Russell via talk wrote:
> Something as complex as a FS needs corporate support, and no company
> wishes to be associated with a convicted murderer. Reiser was also
> famously difficult to get along with (a sample of one of his rants is
> here:
On 09/03/2017 10:18 PM, Stewart C. Russell via talk wrote:
On 2017-09-03 09:56 PM, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
True enough but the project could have been picked up by others.
Something as complex as a FS needs corporate support, and no company
wishes to be associated with a convicted
On 2017-09-03 09:56 PM, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
>
> True enough but the project could have been picked up by others.
Something as complex as a FS needs corporate support, and no company
wishes to be associated with a convicted murderer. Reiser was also
famously difficult to get along with (a
I just installed it yesterday, and it seems much faster than Firefox and
Chrome. I'll play with it some more. There seems to be a lack of plugins,
but the only one I wanted was ad-block plus, which seems to be built-in.
Don
On 3 September 2017 at 20:36, Stewart C. Russell via talk
On 09/03/2017 09:40 PM, Stewart C. Russell via talk wrote:
On 2017-09-03 09:02 PM, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
Remember Reiserfs? … Much more reliable then the equivalent ext
systems but non-technology related issues killed it.
Very much technology related, it seems to me. It's hard to manage
On 09/03/2017 09:20 PM, Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:02 PM Alvin Starr via talk > wrote:
On 09/03/2017 02:53 PM, Dhaval Giani via talk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:13 PM William Park via talk
On 2017-09-03 09:02 PM, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
>
> Remember Reiserfs? … Much more reliable then the equivalent ext
> systems but non-technology related issues killed it.
Very much technology related, it seems to me. It's hard to manage patch
requests when your lead architect is serving 15
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
True enough.
But with Redhat voting with their feet it will make the uptake of BTRFS much
slower if at all.
Remember Reiserfs? I was a great filesystem at least for my use. Much more
reliable then the equivalent ext systems but non-technology
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 9:02 PM Alvin Starr via talk wrote:
> On 09/03/2017 02:53 PM, Dhaval Giani via talk wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:13 PM William Park via talk
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:52:12PM +, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> > On Sun,
On 09/03/2017 02:53 PM, Dhaval Giani via talk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:13 PM William Park via talk > wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:52:12PM +, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM William Park via talk
On 2017-09-02 12:33 PM, Evan Leibovitch via talk wrote:
>
> But no matter. Most of what I want can now be done easily using my
> newly-mapped Compose key. Guess it can't be a standard location because
> there is still a diversity of hardware keyboard layouts out there.
Sun keyboards had it
On 2017-09-02 05:22 AM, Slack Rat via talk wrote:
> Does anyone have any comments on Brendan Eich's new "Brave"
> browser?
Aside from my personal issues with Brendan Eich, I find Brave to be
rather slow. The problem's not my machine, as I'm running a 4 GHz quad
core with 32 GB RAM. It also
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:13 PM William Park via talk
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:52:12PM +, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM William Park via talk
> > wrote:
> > > Now, I read (it's an old news, though) that BTRFS is being
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 05:52:12PM +, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM William Park via talk
> wrote:
> > Now, I read (it's an old news, though) that BTRFS is being "deprecated"
> > by Redhat, and presumably others will follow.
>
> Where have you read
I have BTRFS filesystem used for backup. I chose BTRFS because it can
consolidate old leftover harddisks of various sizes into one big pool,
and it can do "snapshot" which is pretty cheap way to do daily, weekly,
monthly backups.
Now, I read (it's an old news, though) that BTRFS is being
16 matches
Mail list logo