On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
>
> If I set up a router using the 192.168.1.1 I can access some 254
> distinct IP addresses from my router.
>
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
>
> (I'm thinking some 64k worth but
On 2023-04-29 21:18, Kevin Cozens via talk wrote:
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
(My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my
On 2023-04-29 17:48, Scott Allen wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 17:39, James Knott wrote:
That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with IPv4.
No, it's because IPv4 addresses are annotated as x.x.x.x
Sticking with class size masks makes it easy to separate the network
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
(My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my present
network - - - I'm trying to figure out how to
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 17:39, James Knott wrote:
> That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with IPv4.
No, it's because IPv4 addresses are annotated as x.x.x.x
Sticking with class size masks makes it easy to separate the network
address part from the device address part.
On 2023-04-29 17:39, James Knott wrote:
That's only true because people have learned a lot of bad habits with
IPv4. Also, originally, all IPv4 addresses had the same size subnet,
/8. As that allowed only 256 networks, address classes were
introduced, to provide more, smaller networks. Then
On 2023-04-29 16:39, Scott Allen wrote:
Also, forget about address classes. They've
been obsolete for over 30 years.
That said, sticking with class sized masks and matching the network
numbers for class based networks tends to simplify addressing and make
things less confusing.
That's only
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:31, James Knott via talk wrote:
> Also, forget about address classes. They've
> been obsolete for over 30 years.
That said, sticking with class sized masks and matching the network
numbers for class based networks tends to simplify addressing and make
things less
On 2023-04-29 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
If I set up a router using the 192.168.1.1 I can access some 254
distinct IP addresses from my router.
If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
addresses can I access?
You're looking at the wrong numbers. What determines
Here is an OK set of videos on how IPv4 addressing works:
Pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddM9AcreVqY
Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ3T14SIlV4
Pt. 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xlzlgYGqW8
Just try to not pay attention to his millennial bro-ism and excessive use of
the
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
Note that for a local private LAN, you shouldn't use 176.10.x.x
The range allocated for private LANs is 172.16.x.x to 172.31.x.x
Now it's time for
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 13:04 o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> Greetings
>
> (My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
> have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
> just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my present
> network - - -
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 at 16:04, o1bigtenor via talk wrote:
> If I set up a router using the 176.10.1.1 how many distinct IP
> addresses can I access?
>
> (I'm thinking some 64k worth but dunno!)
Correct, except you can't use all 1s or all 0s as a host address, so 64k-2.
--
Scott
---
Post to this
Greetings
(My head is swimming with all the explanations on IP routing - - -
have spent about 3 hours now looking at various documents - - - - I
just can't find a clear answer. The first statement is my present
network - - - I'm trying to figure out how to move beyond the access
of only 254
Thanks!
Went back to check, a cat 6 at a cat5 price?
100 meters of Ethernet cable sounds like a prop for a stunt performance.
Thanks everyone for your ideas and help.
Kare
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:13:11PM -0400, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 09:13:11PM -0400, Karen Lewellen via talk wrote:
> And some of you can, with my joining in, laugh at its simplicity.
> I located another outlet in the room serving as my office, where the
> adapter is connected.
> Suddenly I have the best Internet personally enjoyed in
16 matches
Mail list logo
