On 2023-12-19 17:56, Michael Galea via talk wrote:
[snip]
The one that goes through my mind is: A space alien comes to earth and
lands. And we run up to the S.A. and say "Thank God you're here! You've
got to help us. We got this message from space? And we decoded it? And
it was the plans for
On 2023-12-19 04:45, mwilson--- via talk wrote:
On 2023-12-18 09:41, ac via talk wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:33:24 -0800
Ron / BCLUG via talk wrote:
So, interesting times where only 54 weeks ago, OpenAI devs shocked
the world with the release of ChatGPT 3.x, and now devs in the field
are
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 04:45:40 -0500
mwilson--- via talk wrote:
> > On 2023-12-18 09:41, ac via talk wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:33:24 -0800
> >> Ron / BCLUG via talk wrote:
> >>
> >>> So, interesting times where only 54 weeks ago, OpenAI devs shocked
> >>> the world with the release
> On 2023-12-18 09:41, ac via talk wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:33:24 -0800
>> Ron / BCLUG via talk wrote:
>>
>>> So, interesting times where only 54 weeks ago, OpenAI devs shocked
>>> the world with the release of ChatGPT 3.x, and now devs in the field
>>> are being shocked by open sourced
On 2023-12-18 09:41, ac via talk wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:33:24 -0800
Ron / BCLUG via talk wrote:
So, interesting times where only 54 weeks ago, OpenAI devs shocked
the world with the release of ChatGPT 3.x, and now devs in the field
are being shocked by open sourced (Apache licensed)
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:33:24 -0800
Ron / BCLUG via talk wrote:
>
> So, interesting times where only 54 weeks ago, OpenAI devs shocked
> the world with the release of ChatGPT 3.x, and now devs in the field
> are being shocked by open sourced (Apache licensed) AIs.
the time between the world
Evan Leibovitch via talk wrote on 2023-12-06 09:49:
I've been saying for some time that GTALUG badly needs a serious
conversation on scope and focus.
This evening's meeting feels, in retrospect, quite fruitful in this regard.
We now need to be advocates for openness in the cloud and AI.
I've been saying for some time that GTALUG badly needs a serious
conversation on scope and focus.
With the merger with CLUE nearly complete, we have a national scope.
But also, we need to look further than just Linux IMO as, outside of the
business desktop, that battle is over.
We now need to be
We have, and have had, successful subcommittees before where there was
sufficient interest.
I mildly recommend it, and if we launch such a thing, will communicate its
existence to my team, Machine Learning and Optimization at Index Exchange.
Do you want me to raise it now at work, to see if
so, what I get from your post Scott, that you are saying that "sales" is
for sure one of the first jobs to go?
I am still not very clear on what is currently defined as AI. As we
progress through the next few years I guess it will become more clear.
when all ai is self aware, has EQ, SQ etc
I asked https://huggingface.co/chat/ the question:
"Should the Greater Toronto Area Linux User Group join the AI Alliance?"
and got this answer:
I cannot make a decision for the Greater Toronto Area Linux User Group
(GTA LUG) regarding joining the AI Alliance. However, I can provide
some
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 18:51:25 -0500
Warren McPherson via talk wrote:
> Should we try to join the AI Alliance?
>
this is a beautiful question for so many (and such a vast number of
completely unrelated and) totally different reasons.
as a Linux users group, it will also directly affect us and imo
Should we try to join the AI Alliance?
https://newsroom.ibm.com/AI-Alliance-Launches-as-an-International-Community-of-Leading-Technology-Developers,-Researchers,-and-Adopters-Collaborating-Together-to-Advance-Open,-Safe,-Responsible-AI
---
Post to this mailing list talk@gtalug.org
Unsubscribe
13 matches
Mail list logo
