I highly recommend Vanilla, it's a forum for the 21st century.
On 3/9/07, Ajai Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Cliff Hirsch wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions regarding a great forum package for a
business,
> not consumer, web site? What about vBulletin, although it l
Kenneth Downs ken-at-secdat.com |nyphp dev/internal group use| wrote:
Tom Melendez wrote:
Using an absolute path gets you none of the troubles you mentioned with
relative path, and none of the caching problems you'd get with an
absolute URL.
The only trouble I have found with absolute paths
All, some generally useful stats
> PHP adoption statistics for February 2007 are released.
>
> Statistiques PHP de Février 2007
>
> * PHP 5 reached 15% of all market share :
> its growth is steady.
> * PHP 5.2. is now the most popular PHP 5 version
> * PHP 5.2.1 was the most
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Cliff Hirsch wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions regarding a great forum package for a business,
> not consumer, web site? What about vBulletin, although it looks like a
> commercial product. Is phpBB2 the way to go? I though it was known to have
> security issues. Suggestion
Tom Melendez wrote:
Using an absolute path gets you none of the troubles you mentioned with
relative path, and none of the caching problems you'd get with an
absolute URL.
The only trouble I have found with absolute paths is that it makes the
assumption of DocumentRoot and where your files are
Using an absolute path gets you none of the troubles you mentioned with
relative path, and none of the caching problems you'd get with an
absolute URL.
The only trouble I have found with absolute paths is that it makes the
assumption of DocumentRoot and where your files are to it. If all of
you
Thanks... I sent my response before I got Allen's. All clear now. :)
-Rob
___
New York PHP Community Talk Mailing List
http://lists.nyphp.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
NYPHPCon 2006 Presentations Online
http://www.nyphpcon.com
Show Your Participation in
Thanks for al the suggestions. Sounds like phpBB is an easy way to go.
Vanilla looks interesting too.
On 3/8/07 12:51 PM, "Alvaro P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did have that problem on my website, the CAPTCHA, or image
> verification, that comes by default doesn't do anything against bots.
>
Rob Marscher wrote:
> Absolute path:
> http://www.example.org/css/main.css
This is more often described as an absolute URL, although it does use an
absolute path.
> Relative path that will start at whatever comes after your
> domain (i.e. it's still relative to the domain):
> /css/main.css
This
Kenneth Downs wrote:
Chris Shiflett wrote:
You can still use relative URLs. Just use an absolute path:
/css/main.css
So both are actually relative, it is more a matter of relative from
where? A "relative" path is relative from the complete path of the HTTP
request, while an "absolute" path
On Mar 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Chris Shiflett wrote:
No, an absolute path is different than a relative path. It represents
the same path regardless of the location of the current resource.
Yeah... just to clarify further:
Absolute path:
http://www.example.org/css/main.css
Relative path that will
Kenneth Downs wrote:
> Chris Shiflett wrote:
> > You can still use relative URLs. Just use an absolute path:
> >
> > /css/main.css
>
> So both are actually relative, it is more a matter of relative
> from where?
No, an absolute path is different than a relative path. It represents
the same path
Chris Shiflett wrote:
Kenneth Downs wrote:
It seems that relative links to CSS and JS all suddenly break.
So if you have:
www.example.com/friendly/varname/varvalue/varname/varvalue
and you have a link to "css/main.css", then it will not be able
to find the style sheet anymore.
You ca
Id agree w/ someone else + say @ least look at EC2 from Amazon ...
here is a good podcast on the subject ... http://
www.itconversations.com/shows/detail1728.html
The main point of using the service is that when you hit that spot
where you say "the customer is out growing the hosting solutio
I did have that problem on my website, the CAPTCHA, or image
verification, that comes by default doesn't do anything against bots.
I use this extension: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=344831
for the image verification, I haven't had bots since I implemented it.
(Yes, humans have regi
Cliff Hirsch wrote:
I want to enter the 21st century and add a forum to my site.
My ISP offers phpBB2 and Discuss, a CGI-based forums. Or I can add my own.
Does anyone have suggestions regarding a great forum package for a
business, not consumer, web site? What about vBulletin, although it
lo
Kenneth Downs wrote:
> It seems that relative links to CSS and JS all suddenly break.
> So if you have:
>
> www.example.com/friendly/varname/varvalue/varname/varvalue
>
> and you have a link to "css/main.css", then it will not be able
> to find the style sheet anymore.
You can still use relative
On Mar 8, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Kenneth Downs wrote:
So if you have:
www.example.com/friendly/varname/varvalue/varname/varvalue
and you have a link to "css/main.css", then it will not be able to
find the style sheet anymore.
The most common way, I've seen is to keep all your css at
www.exam
All, see note for the conference next week. I'll be speaking as well. If
you plan on going, let me know and I'll get you in touch with Damien.
Damien Seguy wrote on Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:16 PM:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Just a last and late reminder of the upcoming PHP Québec conference.
> Regular
Last question on friendly URLs.
These are very easy to generate and parse, thanks to the tips I've
gotten here on NYPHP, but I ran into one very strange detail and I'm
sure I'm not the first human being to hit this problem.
It seems that relative links to CSS and JS all suddenly break. So if
I used Mercury Board http://www.mercuryboard.com/ for my site. I tried
phpBB2 but had a lot of issues trying to theme it to match my website.
Every time I'd go to edit a theme, even so much as to simply change a
logo, the whole structure of the board would break down and I'd have to
re-install phpB
Hey all, long time lurker...
I've had problems keeping bots out of phpbb (have tried all sorts of
extensions). vBulletin, no issues. Have they gone after that in
version 3? Other than the bots, I like that system much more than vb.
Cheers,
Pete Czech
--
Pete Czech
Lead Guru
New Possibil
If you don't mind waiting a little, or don't mind it's not officially
out, the first Release Candidate of phpBB3 will soon be released. Even
the beta 5 version is very stable. You can see it in action here
http://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/
Alvaro
Cliff Hirsch wrote:
I want to enter the 21st cen
The best I've seen (thus far) is Vanilla.
http://getvanilla.com
Cliff Hirsch wrote:
I want to enter the 21st century and add a forum to my site.
My ISP offers phpBB2 and Discuss, a CGI-based forums. Or I can add my own.
Does anyone have suggestions regarding a great forum package for a
busin
On 3/8/07, Rob Marscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, you have a regular tag link that goes to the location you
want, but you also have an onclick javascript event for that link that does
the ajax stuff and returns false so that the browser doesn't request the
href part of the tag. Ide
I want to enter the 21st century and add a forum to my site.
My ISP offers phpBB2 and Discuss, a CGI-based forums. Or I can add my own.
Does anyone have suggestions regarding a great forum package for a business,
not consumer, web site? What about vBulletin, although it looks like a
commercial pr
Basically, you have a regular tag link that goes to the location
you want, but you also have an onclick javascript event for that link
that does the ajax stuff and returns false so that the browser
doesn't request the href part of the tag. Ideally, you'll have an
onload event to your page
Mark, web searches on "js graceful degradation" and related terms are
getting me a lot of blog entries about *whether* to do it, but not much
about *how*, can you offer a link that gives the basic howto of putting
both kinds of links on the page? Thanks.
Mark Armendariz wrote:
I like to back
I like to back-load all my ajax on top of already working pages, so for
instance I might have:
http://www.example.com/news/
And clicking on a headline on that page with js disabled would go to
http://www.example.com/news/headline_with_underscores_or_whatever
But clicking on it with js enabled wou
Lately I'm wondering about best designs when balancing things like a
friendly URL, Ajax, and SEO. It seems there are some contradictory
indications.
First, friendly URLs are great if for no reason than log analysis.
However, friendly URLs are supposedly better for SEO also (besides all
the
I use pair networks and like them a lot. Not sure whether they are/not
super competitive on price; very impressed with their service. If you're a
FreeBSD guru (I'm not), then you probably don't want to pay for "service"
you don't need. Here's a link to their pricing so you can compare
apples-to
Anthony wrote:
Hi Hans,
If I were you, I'd stay away from RackShack. While they appear to be a
fairly good company to provide managed hosting, I was told they also
are blacklisted by many ISP's for allowing their customers to spam.
Right now, we're looking for a hosting solution for a new we
32 matches
Mail list logo
