Tom,
Perfect caching is indeed what I am after. Knowing that you work at Y!, I
understand why you need to throw boxes at the problem :)
With anything else, you need to weight whether or not you need it and
> if it is worth the overhead of implementing it.
>
Definitely. I want the api to be sim
Rather than recreating an entire procedure and the functions it uses we'd like
to call the proc from within PHP like you would a stored perl function. We are
an Oracle-PHP shop.
Any suggestions/resources you'd recommend?
___
New York PHP Community Ta
bzcoder,
I hear your point that using a framework, one should be aware of the various
framework-specific options for improving performance. Through the 'tags'
structure, I am trying to create an api to specify the underlying data
points that make up the cache.
I disagree that it is smarter to re
Daniel Convissor wrote:
Paul:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 02:58:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isset($array[$key])
how's that different from array_key_exists?
isset() thinks NULL is not set. Similarly, empty() can be used for stuff
like this, but of course, it thinks NULL, 0, FALS
> I love the idea of providing the cache with an event model, so that
> you can fire events that invalidate the parts of the cache that are
> listening for them. I haven't ever seen that before, but then again I
> don't get out much. Is it derived from some other system/language?
>
When I was work
Patrick May wrote:
Hello,
I'm working on a PHP cache library, and I wanted to check in and see
what folks thought.
Usually, you have many different front end views that you will want to
cache. These may pull from multiple datasources in odd ways. Far
away from the front end, there is back
> I love the idea of providing the cache with an event model, so that
> you can fire events that invalidate the parts of the cache that are
> listening for them. I haven't ever seen that before, but then again I
> don't get out much. Is it derived from some other system/language?
>
> The caches I'v
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Patrick May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom,
>
>> First thoughts: why not Zend or Pear cache libraries?
>>
>>
>> http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.cache.theory.html#zend.cache.factory
>> http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite
>> http://pear.php.net/package/C
This push cache concept has me intrigued.
As to passing a request signature that encodes user agent, language, userid,
etc. - can't this simply be added to the cache id (for instance with
Cache_Lite)? We've had great luck using pretty urls for caching db result set
objects and embedding user
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Patrick May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a PHP cache library, and I wanted to check in and see what
> folks thought.
>
I love the idea of providing the cache with an event model, so that
you can fire events that invalidate the parts of the cache tha
Tom,
First thoughts: why not Zend or Pear cache libraries?
>
>
> http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.cache.theory.html#zend.cache.factory
> http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite
> http://pear.php.net/package/Cache
>
> The pear packages are looking for maintainers - perhaps you could roll
> y
11 matches
Mail list logo
