Re: [nyphp-talk] anyone have idea about the following warning message?

2009-04-29 Thread Tom Sartain
Found this from googling the first sentance: http://www.spiration.co.uk/post/1231/Your%20script%20possibly%20relies%20on%20a%20session%20side-effect Apparently you're trying to assign a global variable into the session directly. Of course, if you could provide some sort of code, we could help out

[nyphp-talk] anyone have idea about the following warning message?

2009-04-29 Thread chad qian
I always get this warning message on one php page: " Warning: Unknown: Your script possibly relies on a session side-effect which existed until PHP 4.2.3. Please be advised that the session extension does not consider global variables as a source of data, unless register_globals is enabled. Y

Re: [nyphp-talk] Remote addess

2009-04-29 Thread John Campbell
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Michele Waldman wrote: > Does anyone know how to configure the server to allow remote access? There is never a valid reason to include remote files, but if you really want to do it, just enable allow_url_fopen and allow_url_include

Re: [nyphp-talk] jQuery (Was: PHP hosting and standard tool-chain for newbie?)

2009-04-29 Thread Ajai Khattri
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Kenneth Downs wrote: > I found myself settling on jQuery UI and then trying to do minimal > additions, this gave some sense of stability. Well the fact that jQuery plays nice with the namespace compared to scriptaculous drew me to it... -- Aj. _

Re: [nyphp-talk] Remote addess

2009-04-29 Thread Anthony Wlodarski
I generally in my code do not access an external server for include and include_once or require_once functions. But I believe http://us2.php.net/manual/en/features.remote-files.php can steer you in the right direction. -Anthony On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Michele Waldman wrote: > When I t

[nyphp-talk] Remote addess

2009-04-29 Thread Michele Waldman
When I try to include a php from a remote server, I get the following error: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration. Does anyone know how to configure the server to allow remote access? Thank you, M* ___ New York PHP User

Re: [nyphp-talk] WAMP (minus the M) forking question - also open to other ideas

2009-04-29 Thread Michael J. Forte
Hi Dan, I must be missing something because I cannot get $->Run() to work period. I have tried the following:   Code 1:     $Wscript = new COM('WScript.Shell');     $Wscript->Run('php.exe -f  testMail.php',0,false);   Result 1:     I am the parent     Running testMail.php     CWD: C:\Prog

Re: [nyphp-talk] WAMP (minus the M) forking question - also open to other ideas

2009-04-29 Thread Michael J. Forte
Yes, that is sad because it PCNTL would do exactly what I need. My blocker is that the third party application I need to run is Windows only. Thank you, Michael J. Forte Web Designer, WR Web Designs Webmaster, Town of LaFayette Software Engineer, IBM Education: Clarkson University Alum

Re: [nyphp-talk] WAMP (minus the M) forking question - also open to other ideas

2009-04-29 Thread Dan Cech
Rene Samson wrote: > I don't know how much control you have over the webserver, but have you > looked at the PCNTL extension? I've played around with it a while ago, > and it works very nicely. I've only used it in a LAMP environment, but > it should do the same in a WAMP environment. Sadly, the P

Re: [nyphp-talk] WAMP (minus the M) forking question - also open to other ideas

2009-04-29 Thread Rene Samson
Michael, I don't know how much control you have over the webserver, but have you looked at the PCNTL extension? I've played around with it a while ago, and it works very nicely. I've only used it in a LAMP environment, but it should do the same in a WAMP environment. Rene Michael J. Forte wro

Re: [nyphp-talk] WAMP (minus the M) forking question - also open to other ideas

2009-04-29 Thread Dan Cech
Michael J. Forte wrote: > - I found COM(Wscript.Shell) ... $->Run(...) on the web but could not get it > working. It would spawn a cmd.exe but would not run the rest of the command. > The > cmd.exe child would not die. If I ran the same command from Start > Run it > would > work just fine. >