On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Mitch Pirtle wrote:
>
> OTOH most object/document databases generate an internal identifier
> for scale, sharding and whatnot (like MongoDB). So there are valid
> reasons for going the auto increment route, but I do believe too many
> people just automatically desig
Did you do an "svn up" before doing all this?
Tried svn up, did a brand new checkout, etc. etc.
What is the output of "svn ls -R trunk"?
Hopefully this is enough info:
oak$ svn ls -R trunk | wc
115 1153790
oak$ svn ls -R trunk | grep global.js
htdocs/static/js/global.js
What
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:27 PM, tedd wrote:
> At 2:06 PM -0400 10/6/09, Dan Cech wrote:
>>
>> tedd wrote:
>> > Dan:
>>>
>>> That's a good point, but I still like having a "separate from data"
>>> auto_increment index for all records. Besides adding one field to a
>>> record, can you see any ha
sounds like you're checking in a file with local modifications, what
does svn stat on that file say?..
I'm not though! I've done this numerous times before with no issues.
Here's a full snap:
oak$ ls
branchestagstrunk
oak$ ls branches
oak$ svn stat
oak$ du -sh trunk
1.6M
