On 9/29/2011 6:10 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
Now what Apple does is really up to Apple. I'm guessing they won't follow the
heard. And why should they? They made their fortune by leading not following.
In which area does Apple lead? Design maybe, but as far as innovation and
product ideas are conc
On 9/29/2011 4:44 PM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
David:
In addition to all that was said about other Languages/Customs having access to
the Internet in their own native Languages, let me add there ARE symbols in the
English Language. We commonly use math symbols, dingbat characters, grammar,
and ot
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:04 PM, John Campbell wrote:
>> This is a problem, but not an unsolvable one. Browsers will support PUNYCODE
>> AND be safe eventually.
> My guess is that
> Safari will become more secure like Chrome/IE/Firefox, not the other
> way around.
Who knows?
I know that the majorit
Heya:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:12:38PM -0400, John Campbell wrote:
>
> The l in the second paypal is actually a ḷ which is an l with a dot
> under it. I could buy that domain and a SSL cert for it
And these days, you can even forge an SSL cert says you're the real
Paypal and/or use newly work
> This is a problem, but not an unsolvable one. Browsers will support PUNYCODE
> AND be safe eventually.
You are right, that it is more complicated than I initially mentioned,
however, chromium has pretty much decided already which way they are
going to go. Don't hold your breath waiting for √.c
On Sep 29, 2011, at 4:12 PM, John Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chris Snyder wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with puny code is that it is a security nightmare, and no
>>> safe browsers are ever going to support it.
>>>
>>>
On Sep 29, 2011, at 3:44 PM, David Krings wrote:
> On 9/29/2011 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
>>> Then again, who wants such a URL for a business anyway? Nobody can type that
>>> letter on their keyboard and the punycode equivalent isn't really easy to
>>> remember or meaningful. Yes, it makes the
On Sep 29, 2011, at 3:44 PM, David Krings wrote:
> On 9/29/2011 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
>> It is designed for people coming from other languages. Like groupon
>> in china is gaopeng.com, but gaopeng is 高朋 when written as characters.
>> 高朋.com is http://xn--bpvz66i.com/ in puny code.
>>
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chris Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
>
>> The problem with puny code is that it is a security nightmare, and no
>> safe browsers are ever going to support it.
>>
>> Can you find the difference between http://paypal.com/ and
>
On 9/29/2011 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
Then again, who wants such a URL for a business anyway? Nobody can type that
letter on their keyboard and the punycode equivalent isn't really easy to
remember or meaningful. Yes, it makes the geek in me smile, but I hardly see
any practical purpose for
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:06 PM, John Campbell wrote:
> The problem with puny code is that it is a security nightmare, and no
> safe browsers are ever going to support it.
>
> Can you find the difference between http://paypal.com/ and
> http://paypaḷ.com/ ?
>
The EV SSL certificate?
I don't kno
We're (Refinery29) are hosting a set of presentations about scaling at our
offices on Tuesday.
Check it out: http://msw-scaling.eventbrite.com/
Work at a tech startup? Wondering how you're going to scale to handle
millions of users and still stay online?
Hear the engineers behind some of the coo
> Then again, who wants such a URL for a business anyway? Nobody can type that
> letter on their keyboard and the punycode equivalent isn't really easy to
> remember or meaningful. Yes, it makes the geek in me smile, but I hardly see
> any practical purpose for this.
It is designed for people comi
On 9/29/2011 11:49 AM, Tedd Sperling wrote:
jerry:
How do I deal with the PUNYCODE problem? I live with it hoping that someday M$
(and others) will find a solution to the homographic problem that they envision
by showing PUNYCODE instead of showing what the IDNS WG wanted.
Cheers,
tedd
Tri
On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:28 PM, Jerry B. Altzman wrote:
> on 9/27/2011 10:56 AM Rukbat said the following:
>> On 9/24/2011 1:51 PM, Chris Snyder wrote:
>>> I hope you renamed your company •.com or similar!
>> Try http://xn--nvg.com/ (That's punycode for the dot.)
>
> It's for sale:
> http://symbold
15 matches
Mail list logo
